APHC010058442026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] MONDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 509/2026 Between: 1. THAMMINENI 2ND PITCHI REDDY, (DIED). 2. THAMMINENI ANASUYAMMA,, W/O LATE 2ND PITCHI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O D.NO.3-15, KRISHNAMSETTYPALLI VILLAGE, GIDDALUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. THAMMINENI LAKSHMI REDDY,, S/O LATE 2ND PITCHI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/O D.NO.3-15, KRISHNAMSETTYPALLI VILLAGE, GIDDALUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. PUNURU SUVARNA,, W/O SHANKAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/O D.NO.3-15, KRISHNAMSETTYPALLI VILLAGE, GIDDALUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. THAMMINENI PEDDI REDDY,, S/O LATE 2ND PITCHI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O D.NO.3-15, KRISHNAMSETTYPALLI VILLAGE, GIDDALUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THAMMINENI 1ST PITCHI REDDY, S/O LATE LAKSHMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS, R/O D.NO.2-21, KRISHNAMSETTYPALLI VILLAGE, GIDDALUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 2. THAMMINENI 3RD PITCHI REDDY ARMY BUJJI, S/O LATE LAKSHMI REDDY, ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O D.NO.3-24, KRISHNAMSETTYPALLI VILLAGE, GIDDALUR MANDAL, 2 PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. THAMMINENI 4TH PITCHI REDDY, S/O LATE LAKSHMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, N/O KRISHNAMSETTYPALLI VILLAGE, GIDDALUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT D.NO.24-602, L.D.P.L COLONY, SECUNDERABAD, RANGA REDDY DISTRICT, TELANGANA STATE. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased topleased to allow the C.R.P by direct the Hon'ble Lower Appellant Court to expedite hearing of the I.A No.792 of 2025 in C.F.R (A.S) No.2498 of 2025, VI Additional District Judge, Markapur, Prakasam District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant permanent injunction restraining the respondents herein and their men from alienating or creating third party interest pertaining to the suit schedule property in O.S No.259 of 2010, on the file of the Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division), Giddalur, Prakasam District, pending disposal of the above revision and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. T V JAGGI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 509/2026 ORDER The Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking for a direction to the learned VI Additional District Judge, Markapur, Prakasam District for speedy disposal of I.A.No.792 of 2025 in C.F.R(A.S).No.2498 of 2025. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. As issuance of notices to the respondent is not necessary in this matter, notice to the respondent is hereby dispensed with. Perused the material on record. 3. On hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the 1st petitioner herein is plaintiff. The plaintiff filed a suit i.e., O.S.No.259 of 2010 for partition and the said suit was dismissed. Aggrieved by the same, the plaintiff intended to prefer an Appeal. Before numbering the said Appeal, the plaintiff died. Then the legal heirs of the plaintiff i.e., petitioner Nos.2 to 5 herein filed an I.A.No.792 of 2025 in C.F.R(A.S).No.2498 of 2025 seeking to condone the delay of one day in preferring the Appeal. He further submits that unless the said interlocutory application is disposed of, the said Appeal cannot be numbered and the interlocutory application filed seeking an interim direction also cannot be numbered and heard. The lower appellate Court ought to have given short date for serving of the notice to the respondents therein. But, without doing so the matter was adjourned from 30.01.2026 to 4 10.03.2026. In view of dismissal of the Suit, the respondents herein are creating third party interest in respect of the suit schedule properties. If, the lower appellate Court did not dispose of I.A.No.792 of 2025 at the earliest and number the appeal, the rights of the petitioners herein may be deprived. Hence, the learned counsel for the petitioners requests this Court to issue an appropriate direction to the learned VI Additional District Judge, Markapur, Prakasam District for speedy disposal of the I.A.No.792 of 2025 in C.F.R(A.S).No.2498 of 2025. 4. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners and on perusal of the material placed, this Court inclined to dispose of the Civil Revision Petition directing the learned VI Additional District Judge, Markapur, Prakasam District to dispose of I.A.No.792 of 2025 in C.F.R(A.S).No.2498 of 2025, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six (06) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. With the above direction, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 02.03.2026 Note: C.C. by one(1) week B/o.BSP/TPS 5 10 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 509/2026 02.03.2026 Note: C.C. by one(1) week B/o.BSP/TPS