DR. VISHNU KUMAR SHARMA S/O RAMESH CHANDRA SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/1709/2026 · 2026-01-30
Sameer Jain
Special Leave Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16407 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16407 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:4269] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1709/2026 Dr. Vishnu Kumar Sharma S/o Ramesh Chandra Sharma, Aged About 60 Years, R/o 38, Laxmi Colony, Naya Khera, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan, At Present Working On The Post Of Smo-I At Govt. Ayurved Aushdhalaya, Dher Ke Balaj, Jaipur-A. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Ayurveda (Ayush), Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).
2. Deputy Secretary, Department Of Ayurveda And Bhartiya Chikitsa (Ayush), Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).
3. The Director, Nideshalay Ayurved Vibhag, Rajasthan, Ajmer, Rajasthan-305001 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Neetu Bhansali for Mr. Amit Jindal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vishnu Dutt Sharma with Ms. Epsa Nangalia for Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order 30/01/2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.20611/2025 titled Dr. Gurudutt Sharma & Ors. Versus State of Rajasthan & Ors. judgment dated
06.01.2026. It is submitted that the matter of Ayurvedic doctors and superannuation age is no more res integra. It is submitted that an SLP was preferred by the respondent-State, and the same has also been dismissed. It is also submitted that the matter can be decided in light of above referred judgment.
[2026:RJ-JP:4269] (2 of 2) [CW-1709/2026]
2.
Learned counsel for the respondents is not able to refute the said contention.
3. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands allowed in light of judgment of Dr. Gurudutt Sharma (supra).
4. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK /14