Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16406 (RAJ)

RANVIR SINGH BIJARNIA S/O MADAN LAL BIJARNIA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMA/37/2026 · 2026-01-22

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:2972] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.37/2026 In S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.669/2026 Ranvir Singh Bijarnia S/o Madan Lal Bijarnia, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Panlava, Tehsil Laxmangarh, Police Station Balara, District Sikar (Raj.) At Present Resident Of 103-B, Kateva Nagar, New Sanganer Road, Jaipur (Raj.). (At Present Lodged In District Jail, Sikar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashvin Garg, Adv. with Mr. Nonit Hatila, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishiraj Singh Rahtore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 22/01/2026 1. The matter comes upon an application No. 37/2026 seeking correction in the order dated 16.01.2026 passed by this Court, wherein in paragraph No. 2 and 5 it has been mentioned that the offences alleged are “triable by Magistrate”. It is contended that the offences is, in fact, “triable by Court of Session”, therefore, the words “triable by Magistrate” may kindly be corrected. 2. Heard and perused the order dated 16.01.2026. 3. It is apparent that in paragraph Nos. 2 and 5 of the said order, the expression “triable by Magistrate” has been mentioned [2026:RJ-JP:2972] (2 of 2) [CRLMA-37/2026] inadvertently and in place thereof, expression "triable by Court of Session" shall be used. 4. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and the expression "triable by Magistrate" shall be read as "triable by Court of Session". 5. This order shall remain part of the earlier order dated 16.01.2026 passed by this Court. 6. Accordingly, the instant application stands disposed of. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-49