Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010183692026 2026:GAU-AS:15665 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/890/2026 ROHIT BORO S/O RAJEN BORO RESIDENT OF DHULABARI SARANPARA P.O PS TAMALPUR, DIST. BAKSA, ASSAM VERSUS STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY ITS LD. PP, ASSAM 2:SMT SUMA DEBNATH WIFE OF SAJAL DEBNATH RESIDENT OF 03 DARAN DEKA PATH NEAR GAYAN SCHOOL JYOTIKUCHI PS DISPUR GUWAHATI EAST ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A BHATTACHARYA, MS. K MALAKAR,MS K TALUKDAR,MR. A BHATTACHARJEE,S J BASAK,N MECH Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER Date : 14.10. 2026 Heard Mr. A. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Sarma, learned Addl. P.P. for the State of Assam. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner stated that inadvertently the informant in the connected FIR had not been impleaded as a party respondent in the connected bail petition. He has accordingly submitted that he may be allowed to file an amended cause title in the bail application, after allowing the impleadment of the opposite party No.2 herein as respondent No.2 in the bail petition. The prayer is considered and allowed. 3. The Opposite No.2 herein shall be impleaded as the respondent No.2 in the connected bail petition. 4. The I.A. is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant