[2026:RJ-JP:4610] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1670/2026 Banwari S/o Ramesh Chand, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Gurira, Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg ( Rajasthan) ( At Present In Central Jail In Judicial Custody Since 09-01-2026) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anuj Rohila For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 31/01/2026 1. The accused-petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.331/2025 registered with the Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg for offence under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 74 and 303(2) of B.N.S., 2023. 2. The learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that there are general allegations against the accused-petitioner and no specific overt act has been assigned to him. He also submits that only one injury sustained by the injured complainant party, has been opined to be dangerous to [2026:RJ-JP:4610] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1670/2026] life, which is on the left leg of the injured and the said injury has not been attributed to the present accused-petitioner. He further submits that there are cross cases in between the parties. He also submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 09.01.2026 and trial of the case is likely to take considerable time to conclude, therefore, he may be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material made available on record. 5. Taking into consideration the submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioner, so also the fact that only one injury sustained by the injured has been opined to be dangerous to life and the same has not been attributed by the present accused-petitioner and also the fact that there are cross cases in between the parties, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before [2026:RJ-JP:4610] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1670/2026] that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /242