p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMP No. 70 of 2026 Chittaranjan Sahani …. Petitioner Mr. Byomakesh Tripathy, Advocate -versus- 1. State of Odisha, represented by the Secretary, Home Department, Bhubaneswar 2. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Cuttack 3. The Inspector in-charge, CRRI Police Station, Cuttack …. Opp. Parties Mr. Sarathi Jyoti Mohanty, Additional Standing Counsel CORAM: HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO ORDER Order No. 19.02.2026 (Through hybrid Mode) 02. 1. The CRLMP has been filed challenging the inaction of the I.I.C., CRRI Police Station, Cuttack is not registering the FIR on the written complaint dated 06.12.2025 of the Petitioner. 2. After noting the nature of allegations made in the complaint of the Petitioner, by order dated 05.02.2026, this Court had directed the learned Additional Standing Counsel to obtain instructions from the I.I.C., CRRI Police Station, Cuttack if the matter could be amicably settled between the parties. 3. Instructions dated 11.02.2026 of the I.I.C., CRRI Police Station, Cuttack is produced where it is stated that the dispute between the parties were clearly matrimonial in nature and after p. 2 counselling of both the parties by ASI, Ms. Manjulata Paikary of the Police Station, the parties agreed for an amicable settlement, pursuant to which both of them are living together. The copies of the undertakings of both the parties are also enclosed with the instructions. 4. Mr. Byomakesh Tripathy, learned counsel for the Petitioner also submits that now the parties are residing together after an amicable settlement. 5. The CRLMP is accordingly disposed of appreciating the role of I.I.C., CRRI Police Station, Cuttack and ASI, Ms. Manjulata Paikary in resolving the matrimonial dispute between the parties 6. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application. (Savitri Ratho) Judge Sukanta Designation: Senior Stenographer