Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:17084
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (Civil) No. 1013 of 2025
Karma Mahto, aged about 72 years, son of Shiv Nath Mahto, resident of Tapin South Colony, P.O. Tapin, P.S. Charhi and District Hazaribagh
… … Petitioner
Versus
1. State of Jharkhand
2. Management of Tapin South Colliery of M/s Central Coalfields Limited, Darbhanga House, P.O. Head Post Officer, P.S. Kotwali, District Ranchi
… … Opp. Parties
---
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
05/12th June 2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. Kushal Kumar is present.
2. Nobody appears on behalf of the opposite party.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in terms of
order passed in W.P. (L) No. 5494/2010, the opposite party has paid gratuity of Rs. 10,00,000/- and lump sum compensation of Rs. 5,00,000/- to the petitioner. He submits that there was a direction to pay monetary compensation in accordance with law and there is no justification for making payment of lump sum compensation.
4. Considering the nature of order passed by this Court, this Court is of the view that the quantum of compensation cannot be decided by this Court in contempt proceeding.
5. However, it will be open to the petitioner to take steps in connection with the orders passed by the opposite party annexed along with the show cause.
6. With the aforesaid liberty, the present contempt proceeding is hereby dropped.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Mukul/-