[2026:RJ-JP:7396] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1782/2026 Girijesh Purohit Son Of Late Shri Mangleshwar Purohit, Aged About 59 Years, Resident Of 1 Kha 19, Machhala Mangra Scheme, Sector-11, Udaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary To Government, Education Department (Physical Education), Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. Director, Pension And Pensioners Welfare Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ajay Gupta with Ms. Sampti Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 16/02/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that identical controversy has already been raised, considered and adjudicated upon by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Balram Verma Versus The Union of India & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18106/2012, vide order dated 18th November, 2017,after hearing the learned counsel for the respondents. 2. It is further contended that for the present, the petitioner would be satisfied, if the State-respondents are directed to decide the representation of the petitioner in the backdrop of the adjudication made in the case of Balram Verma (supra), [2026:RJ-JP:7396] (2 of 2) [CW-1782/2026] within a time frame, which they are ready and willing to address within two weeks hereinafter. 3. In view of the limited prayer addressed, the instant writ proceedings are closed with a direction to the petitioner to address a comprehensive representation enclosing a copy of the adjudication in the case of Balram Verma (supra). 4. In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid period, the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law, however, in no case later than twelve weeks from the date of receipt of the representation along with a certified copy of this order. 5. With the observations and directions, as indicated above, the writ application stands disposed of. 6. All pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /80