- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19413 WP No. 9494 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 9494 OF 2026 (LA-KIADB) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. L. RAMAREDDY, S/O LATE LINGAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS 2. SMT. SULOCHANA W/O LATE L PAPAIHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS 3. SRI. L. ANANDA REDDY S/O LATE LINGAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS 4. SRI. JANARDHANA L S/O LATE LINGAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS 5. SRI. K L UMA MAHESH S/O LATE LINGAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS PETITIONER NOS. 1 TO 5 RESIDING AT: SARJAPUR MAIN ROAD, DODDAKANNELLI, CARMELARAM POST, BENGALURU - 560 035 … PETITIONERS (BY SRI. LEELARAJU M N., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by VIDYA G R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19413 WP No. 9494 of 2026 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE, VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD (KIADB), REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER, NO.14/3, 2ND FLOOR, RASHTROTHANA PARISHAT BUILDING, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER - 2, KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD, 1ST FLOOR, MAHARSHI ARAVIND BHAVAN, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. 4. RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY (KARNATAKA) LIMITED (K-RIDE), REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, KHANIJA BHAVAN, EAST WING, RACE COURSE ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. HARISH A.S., AGA FOR R1; SRI P.V. CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19413 WP No. 9494 of 2026 THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO A) DIRECTING THE R3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 11/03/2026 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS, PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-E AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking to withdraw the petition. 2. The memo is taken on record. It reads as follows:- "The undersigned Counsel for the Petitioners respectfully submits that the above petition was filed by the Petitioners against the Respondent No.3 seeking to Issue a writ of Mandamus to consider the representation dated: 11.03.2026 submitted by the petitioners and directing the respondent authorities to permit the petitioners to Participate in the proceedings relating to determination and disbursement of compensation arising out of the acquisition of land. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19413 WP No. 9494 of 2026 The Petitioner submits that the Petitioner does not wish to proceed with the above petition and the same may kindly be dismissed as not pressed. In view of the above said matter, it is most humbly prayed that this Hon'ble High Court may be pleased to dispose of the present petition as not pressed, in the interest of justice and equity." 3. In light of the memo filed and submission made, the petition is dismissed as not pressed. SD/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE VGR