Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16383 (RAJ)

ROOPNARAYAN MEENA S/O SHRI KALYAN SAHAI MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/1894/2026 · 2026-02-09

Anand Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:5960] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1894/2026 Roopnarayan Meena S/o Shri Kalyan Sahai Meena, Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of Village Dangarwada Khurd, Batwadi, Post Langadiyawas, Tehsil Jamwaramgarh, District Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Livestock And Animal Husbandry Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Animal Husbandry Department, Pashudhan Bhawan, Jaipur. 3. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Jaipur Having Its Office At Rajasthan Agriculture Management Institute, Durgapura, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Illyas Khan, Adv. & Ms. Sarah Parveen, Adv. for Mr. Tanveer Ahamad, Adv. For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 09/02/2026 1. It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner appeared in the recruitment process for the post of Animal Attendant in the category of Specially Abled Person, as he possesses disability certificate dated 12.04.2023 issued by the Competent Authority reflecting that the petitioner is suffering from 53% disability in the sub category of Low Vision. He submits that vide order dated 27.06.2025, all the persons selected under Specially Abled category were directed to appear before Nodal Officer, Physically Disabled Board SMS Hospital, Jaipur and accordingly, the petitioner also appeared before the Board on 17.07.2025. He submits that the petitioner was also examined by [2026:RJ-JP:5960] (2 of 2) [CW-1894/2026] the Board, however, thereafter nothing has been communicated to the petitioner and despite the fact that the petitioner has secured more marks, i.e., 91.4014 than the cut off marks, i.e., 88.1274, appointment has not been given to him. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 3. It is not disputed that vide order dated 27.06.2025, the petitioner was directed to appear before the Medical Board for re- assessment of his physical disability and as per the petitioner, in compliance of such order, the petitioner also appeared before the Medical Board, yet nothing has been communicated to the petitioner. 4. Under these circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of at this stage with direction to the petitioner to submit a representation before the Director, Animal Husbandry Department, Jaipur, who shall communicate the petitioner the result of re-medical examination conducted by the Medical Board on 17.07.2025 and in case, the petitioner is found eligible so far as his physical disability is concerned, the respondents shall proceed further and consider the candidature of petitioner for appointment as per the marks awarded to him. Necessary exercise shall be undertaken by the Director, Animal Husbandry within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of representation from the petitioner. 5. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J Jatin /43