[2026:JHHC:16903] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5127 of 2026 1. Arman, Aged about 26 years, Son of Juman, Resident of Shastri Nagar, Bhurkunda, Bicha, P.S. Ramgarh PO: Deoria Bargaon. District Ramgarh 2. Shubham Kumar, Aged about 28 years, Son of Umesh Ram, Resident of Shastri chowk, Sundar nagar, Bhurkunda, Ghaghra, P.S. Ramgarh P.O. Deoria Bargaon, District Ramgarh. 3. Riku Ansari @ Rinku Ansari, Aged about 36 years, Son of Irshad Ansari @ Asraf Ansari, Resident of Shastri chowk, Bhurkunda, Ghaghra, P.S. Ramgarh, PO: Deoria Bargaon, District: Ramgarh … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Ayush Kr. Verma, Adv. For the State : Mr. P. D. Agrawal, Spl. PP 02 / 11.06.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Pithoria P. S. case no. 27 of 2006 instituted under Section 310 of BNS, 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners have committed dacoity and looted copper winding worth Rs. 4,00,000/-, two NVR systems with accessories from the CCTV control room, switch blade of 312 KV Irba bay line isolator, one torch and cash from the victims Vijay Kumar and from Ashok Prasad Sahu. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 16 of the bail application. It is next submitted that without putting the petitioner on TIP, as mentioned in para 10 of the Bail Application, chargesheet has been submitted against the petitioners. It is next submitted that the petitioners have been in jail custody since 24.03.2026 , as mentioned in para 1 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case hence, the petitioners may be admitted to bail. Learned Spl. P.P. opposed the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioners on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioners on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Ranchi in connection with Pithoria P. S. case no. 27 of 2006 with the condition that the petitioners will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Dated 11.06.2026 Smita/-