SACHIN AND NAVEEN v. STATE (THE NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR
BAIL APPLN./3539/2026 · 2026-08-25
Prateek Jalan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16379 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16379 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
BAIL APPLN. 3539/2026 $~98 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010401362026 + BAIL APPLN. 3539/2026& CRL.M.A. 26391/2026 SACHIN AND NAVEEN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Kumar, Ms. Khushboo Sharma, Mr. Kartik and Mr. Govind Keshav, Advocates. versus STATE (THE NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP with SI Satish Kumar. CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN O R D E R % 25.08.2026
1. By way of this application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with FIR No. 818/2025, dated 27.11.2025, registered at Police Station Shahbad Dairy, Outer North District, Delhi, under Sections 74/75/76/65(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and Sections 6/12 of theProtection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. 2. After some arguments, Mr. Amit Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this petition, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioner in the ongoing criminal proceedings. He, however, seeks a clarification that the observations of the Special Court in its order dated 18.08.2026, rejecting the petitioner’s This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/08/2026 at 15:02:02
BAIL APPLN. 3539/2026 application for bail, should not come in the way of the petitioner in the trial. 3. Ms. Manjeet Arya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, accepts that orders in a bail application are always for the purpose of disposal of the bail application. The Trial Court will independently examine the evidence at the culmination of the proceedings, and take an appropriate decision in accordance with law. 4. Mr. Kumar submits that one page of the order of the learned Special Court dated 18.08.2026 has been erroneously missed,and one page of a different order has been placed on record. A complete copy of the order dated 18.08.2026 has been handed up in Court, and is taken on record. 5. The bail application, alongwith pending application, is dismissed as withdrawn in termsof the above. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations on the merits of the case, which shall be decided by the Trial Court in accordance with law.
PRATEEK JALAN, J AUGUST 25, 2026 SS/KA/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/08/2026 at 15:02:02