BAIJNATH RAM v. M/S CENTRAL COALFIELD LIMITED THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN-CUM-MANAGING DIRECTOR, DARBHANGA HOUSE, RANCHI
C.M.P./38/2026 · 2026-06-12
Anubha Rawat Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16376 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16376 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:17030
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
C.M.P. No. 38 of 2026
Baijnath Ram, aged about 36 years, Son of Mundrika Ram, Resident of Bishrampur, Rankaraj, P.O.- Bishrampur, P.S.-Ranka, Dist.- Garhwa.
… … Petitioner
Versus
1. M/s Central Coalfield Limited through its Chairman- cum- Managing Director, Darbhanga House, Ranchi, office at Kutchery Road, P.O. & P.S.- Morabadi, Dist.- Ranchi.
2. The Director Personnel (Head Quarter), Central Coalfield Limited, Darbhanga House, Ranchi, office at Kutchery Road, P.O. & P.S.- Morabadi, Dist.- Ranchi.
3. The General Manager, Bachra Colliery Project, Central Coalfield Limited, P.Ο. & P.S.-Bachra, Dist.-Chatra.
4. The General Manager, Piparwar Area, Central Coalfield Limited, P.O. & P.S.-Piparwar, Dist.-Chatra.
5. Savita Devi, Wife of Late Rampravesh Ram, Resident of Bachra Colliery, 122 Colony, Room No. 454, P.O. & P.S.-Bachra, Dist.- Chatra.
… … Opp. Parties ---
CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Amandeep Kr. Pandey, Advocate
For the Opp. Party- CCL : Mr. Anupam Shandilya, Advocate
---
12/12.06.2026
Learned counsels for the parties are present.
2. This petition has been filed for restoration of W.P.(S) No. 7324 of 2023 which stood dismissed on 10.06.2024 due to non-removal of defect in terms of order dated 07.05.2024.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on account of inadvertence, the defects in the writ petition could not be removed. He has referred to paragraph 7 of the present petition.
4.
Learned counsel for the opposite party- CCL is present. He submits that there is a private respondent in this case.
5. To this, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no notice was ever issued to the private respondent and the writ petition has been dismissed on account of non-removal of defects. The private respondent is the wife of the deceased and the petitioner is the brother of the deceased and they are fighting with respect to employment by CCL.
2026:JHHC:17030
2
6. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances and being satisfied with the cause shown with respect to non-removal of defects within the stipulated time, the time for removal of defects in W.P.(S) No. 7324 of 2023 granted vide order dated 07.05.2024 is extended till 07th July, 2026.
7. If the defects in the writ petition are removed within the extended time, office is directed to place the writ petition before appropriate Bench as per roster.
8. This civil miscellaneous petition is accordingly disposed of.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.)
Date of order: 12.06.2026 Date of uploading:15.06.2026 Pankaj