MUZAMIL @ SHAIK MUZAMIL v. STATE BY BOMMANAHALLI POLICE
CRL.P/10803/2023 · 2026-02-20
M Nagaprasanna
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16374 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16374 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10757 CRL.P No. 10803 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10803 OF 2023 BETWEEN:
MUZAMIL @ SHAIK MUZAMIL S/O SAHAZAN AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS PERMANENT R/O DR. NO.25-1-4593 SANJAYGANDHI NAGAR, 2ND CROSS NELLORE ANDHRA PRADESH – 524 001. …PETITIONER (BY SRI KIRAN KUMAR H., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
STATE BY BOMMANAHALLI POLICE BENGALURU CITY REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU – 560 001.
2.
ANISA SHEIK D/O SHEIK ABDULLA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS R/AT NO.14, I CROSS RAJENDRANAGARA, 7TH MAIN ROAD 8TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA
Digitally signed by SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10757 CRL.P No. 10803 of 2023
BENGALURU – 560 095. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI VINAY MAHADEVAIAH, HCGP FOR R1;
SMT. SHEETAL SONI, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE CHARGE SHEET FILED IN CR.NO.153/2022 REGISTERED BY BOMMANAHALLI POLICE STATION WHICH IS REGISTERED IN C.C.NO.37730/2022 PENDING BEFORE CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE AT BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 354, 354-B, 323, 504, 506 OF IPC BY ALLOWING THIS PETITION.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR REPORT SETTLEMENT, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
ORAL ORDER Petitioner – accused is before this Court calling in question proceedings in C.C.No.37730/2022, pending before the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru, for the offences punishable under Sections 354, 354(b), 323, 504 and 506 of the IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent No.2 in unison submit that during the pendency of these proceedings, the parties to the lis have settled their disputes amicably and have filed a compromise petition under Sections
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10757 CRL.P No. 10803 of 2023
320 r/w. 528 of the BNSS, 2023 and compromise affidavit before this Court seeking permission to compound the offences. 3. The compromise petition reads as follows:
“3. That, the compromise has been entered into voluntarily out of free without any threat, coercion, pressure or undue influence from any person. That both the parties, fully understand the terms of the compromise and are satisfied with the same below mentioned. a. That we are Petitioner and Respondent No.2 in the above mentioned both the cases and we are well acquainted with the facts and we are willing to compromise through this petition. b. Both the parties voluntarily agreed to compromise the matter in the interest of maintaining their respective future lives. c. That compromise has been entered into voluntarily out of free will and consent without any threat, coercion, pressure or undue influence from any person whatsoever. d. That both the parties have mutually agreed not to interfere in each other's personal life in any manner herein after. e. That both the parties undertake to maintain peace and not to initiate any civil or criminal proceedings against each other in respect of the subject matter of present case. f. That compromise is genuine, bonafide and lawful and is not against public policy or morality.
g. That this affidavit is filed in support of the compromise petition filed before this Hon'ble Court seeking quashing/ closure of the criminal proceeding in the above mentioned both cases.”
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10757 CRL.P No. 10803 of 2023
Though the offences alleged against the petitioners in the case at hand inter alia are the ones punishable under Sections 504 and 506 of the IPC, which are non-cognizable offences, since it is a dispute between the parties and the allegations are not against the State, I deem it appropriate to accept the compromise petition and compromise affidavit and terminate the proceedings against the petitioner. 4. For the aforesaid reasons, I pass the following:
ORDER (i) The criminal petition is disposed. (ii) The proceedings in C.C.No.37730/2022, pending before the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru, stand quashed.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
NVJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 115