Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16364 (RAJ)

BHURI SINGH S/O JAYLAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/1631/2026 · 2026-01-29

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:4069] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1631/2026 Bhuri Singh son of Jaylal, resident of Rajaikhurd, Police Station Basaidang, at present Rahal Police Station Kanchanpur District Dholpur (At present confined in District Jail Dholpur). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dushyant Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 29/01/2026 1. This bail application under Section 483 of BNSS has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.321/2025 registered at Police Station Nihalganj, District Dholpur for offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3) & 340(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023 and Sections 6, 7, 8 & 10 of Rajasthan Public Examination (Measures for Prevention of Unfair Means in Recruitment) Act, 2022. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that there is allegation against the petitioner that he appeared in the same examination twice, on two different dates. It is submitted that charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. There are no criminal antecedents against the [2026:RJ-JP:4069] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1631/2026] petitioner. Counsel submits that the petitioner is in custody since 19.12.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially considering the fact that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner, as also the fact that charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner- Bhuri Singh son of Jaylal shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. However, it is made clear that the petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of bail granted by this Court. [2026:RJ-JP:4069] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1631/2026] 8. If breach of this condition is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to the petitioner by this Court. 9. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /151