[2026:RJ-JP:4334] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1532/2026 Lakhan Singh Alias Bablu S/o Ramveer, R/o Village Jamura Police Station Badi Sadar District Dholpur. (Accused Petitioner In Judicial Custody In District Jail Dholpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sumit Kumar Jain Mr. Dhananjay Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishiraj Singh Rathore, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asst. G.A. Mr. Ankur Singh Tomar, for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 30/01/2026 1. This bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.248/2025 registered at Police Station Kotwali Dholpur, District Dholpur for offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 125, 333, 303(2) & 109(1) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (in short, ‘BNS’), 2023. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel contend that petitioner is not named in the FIR. It is contended that other co-accused persons have been granted benefit of bail by this Court as well as by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. [2026:RJ-JP:4334] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1532/2026] Learned counsel submit that trial will take time in its conclusion. It is submitted that petitioner has no criminal antecedents and he is in custody since 18.01.2026. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant vehemently opposes the submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard. Perused the material available on record. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, as also considering the fact that petitioner is not named in the FIR; petitioner has no criminal antecedents; co-accused persons have been granted bail by this Court as well as by Co- ordinate Bench of this Court; trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of this case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Lakhan Singh Alias Bablu S/o Ramveer, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. [2026:RJ-JP:4334] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1532/2026] 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /35