ASHWANI SANKHYAN AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS
CRMMO/220/2026 · 2026-07-21
Rakesh Kainthla
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16362 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16362 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr.MMO No. 220 of 2026
Decided on 21.07.2026
Ashwani Sankhyan & another ....Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & others
....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? No. For the petitioners : Mr. Mukesh Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents
: Mr. Lokender Kutlehria, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 and 2.
Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral)
Learned Additional Advocate General submits that the State is going to file a cancellation report in the matter, hence, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he does not want to press the present petition, at this stage, and seeks permission to withdraw the same. Ordered accordingly.
The petition stands disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any
(Rakesh Kainthla)
Judge 21st July, 2026 (ravinder)