IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 132 CR-3362-2026 Date of Decision.: 21.04.2026 Surender Singh …..Pe--oner Vs. Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. Manesar Gurugram .….Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Ms. Pallavi Babbar, Advocate for the peoner. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Civil suit bearing No.CS-456-2024 tled “Surender Singh vs. DHBVNL” is pending before learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Gurugram. The plainff of the case moved an applicaon before learned District Judge, Gurugram to transfer the case to the Special Court having exclusive jurisdicon in the ma5er on the ground that the Civil Court lacked jurisdicon. That applicaon has been rejected by the District Judge by way of impugned order dated 16.03.2026 giving liberty to the peoner- plainff to move appropriate applicaon for returning the plaint under Order VII Rule 10 CPC before the trial Court and that transfer applicaon was not maintainable. It is the aforesaid order, which is now assailed before this Court. This Court does not find any illegality in the impugned order. In case, the concerned Civil Court does not have the jurisdicon in the ma5er, the plainff- peoner will be at liberty to move appropriate applicaon before the Court concerned for returning of the plaint under NEETIKA TUTEJA 2026.04.21 18:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR-3362-2026 Order VII Rule 10 CPC so as to present the same before the appropriate forum. Disposed of with aforesaid liberty. (DEEPAK GUPTA) JUDGE April 21, 2026 Neeka Tuteja Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Page No. 2 of 2 Pages NEETIKA TUTEJA 2026.04.21 18:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document