IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.81 of 2026 Date of decision: 21.07.2026 Vinay Kumar Sharma. ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Anr. …Respondents. Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Roop Lal Chaudhary, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents-State. Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge Learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, submits that in view of subsequent developments, present petition has become infructuous and nothing survives to be adjudicated. 2. Accordingly, present petition is disposed of being infructuous along with pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Vivek Singh Thakur) Judge (Ranjan Sharma) Judge 21st July, 2026 (Pardeep) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes