UNION TERRITORY THROUGH POLICE STATION VILLGAM v. ABDUL HAMEED RATHER
CRM(M)/395/2026 · 2026-07-01
Shahzad Azeem
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1635 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1635 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No.11 Regular Cause List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR CRM(M) 395/2026 CrlM(920/2026) Union Territory Through Police Station Villgam. …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Faheem Nisar Shah, GA.
Vs. Abdul Hameed Rather. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Imtiyaz Ahmad Sofi, Advocate. (Through Virtual Mode)
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM, JUDGE.
ORDER 01.07.2026 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after filing of the instant petition, the respondent-accused has surrendered before the Superintendent, District Jail, Kupwara in terms of impugned order dated 15th May, 2026. However, the learned counsel further submits that the learned trial court though granted bail to the respondent for a limited time, but without taking into consideration the antecedents of the respondent and heinousness of the crime, therefore, he seeks word of caution, so that in future the bail may not be granted in a routine manner. Since the accused has surrendered before the jail authorities and the Court is not touching upon the merits of the case, therefore, this point is left open to be decided in the appropriate proceedings.
Once the accused has surrendered before the jail authorities in terms of the impugned order, there remains nothing for adjudication on merits. Therefore, the petition having been rendered infructuous, the same is accordingly dismissed.
(SHAHZAD AZEEM)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 01.07.2026
“Hamid”
Abdul Hamid Bhat I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 01.07.2026