VIKASH PRASAD RANA @ BITTU RANA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./5154/2026 · 2026-06-11
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16349 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16349 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:16890 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.5154 of 2026
------ Vikash Prasad Rana @ Bittu Rana, aged about 37 years, son of Shyam Prasad Rana, resident of House No.386, Sarwoday Nagar, P.O.-Chas, P.S.-Bokaro, District-Bokaro, Jharkhand.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Birendra Kumar, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 11-06-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Ormanjhi P.S. Case No.32 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 331(4) and 305(a) of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed theft of jewelleries, ornaments, utensils and cash from the house of the informant. It is next submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused Paras Kumar Choudhary. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant/victim or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is also submitted that the co- accused has already been granted bail. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 30.03.2026 as is evident from para- 07 of this bail application. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on
bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class-XVI, Ranchi in connection with Ormanjhi P.S. Case No.32 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 11/06/2026 Abhiraj/