Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16342 (RAJ)

MANJU GOUTTAM D/O VIDHYADHAR GAUTAM W/O GOVIND SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/135/2026 · 2026-01-31

Anil Kumar Upman

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:4614] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 135/2026 1. Manju Gouttam D/o Vidhyadhar Gautam W/o Govind Sharma, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Mahajan Mohalla, Bahrawada Khurd, District Sawai Madhopur, Presently R/o Aniyala, Police Station Khandar, District Sawai Madhopur. 2. Govind Sharma S/o Babulal Sharma, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Aniyala, Police Station Khandar, District Sawai Madhopur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Superintendent Of Police, Sawai Madhopur. 3. SHO, Police Station Khandar, District Sawai Madhopur. 4. Vidhyadhar Gautam S/o Kanhaiya Lal Gautam, R/o Mahajan Mohalla, Bahrawada Khurd, District Sawai Madhopur 5. Kamlesh Grujar S/o Kanhaiya Lal, R/o Mayi Khurd, Police Station Khandar, District Sawai Madhopur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Virender Godara For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 31/01/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled. 2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel. 3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.4 & 5 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. [2026:RJ-JP:4614] (2 of 2) [CRLW-135/2026] 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. It is submitted that petitioners have entered into marriage as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Arya Samaj Sansthan, Lal Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur on 13.01.2026 and same has been registered on 13.01.2026. The certificate of registration of marriage of the petitioners is annexed with this petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos.4 & 5 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection. 5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.3-Station House Officer, Police Station, Khandar, District Sawai Madhopur and respondent no.3 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. 6. The criminal writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /50