Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16340 (KAR)

SRI P O VIJAY REDDY @ VIJAYAKUMAR REDDY v. THE COMMISSIONER

WP/5017/2026 · 2026-02-17

Suraj Govindaraj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9831 WP No. 5017 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 5017 OF 2026 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. P O VIJAY REDDY @ VIJAYAKUMAR REDDY AGED 63 YEARS S/O OBAREDDY R/A NO. 1277, 'A' BLOCK, VIEJINAPUARA, DHOORAVANI NAGAR, BANGALORE …PETITIONER (BY SRI. DILIP KUMARGOWDA R.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER MYSURU URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 4 MYSURU, KARNATAKA - 570 023. 2. THE DIRECTOR TOWN PLANNING AUTHORITY MYSURU URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MYSURU, KARNATAKA - 570 023. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. T.P. VIVEKANANDA, ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-DIRECT, DIRECTING THE R-1 AND 2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DTD 29.01.2026, VIDE ANNX-L SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9831 WP No. 5017 of 2026 ORAL ORDER 1. Sri.T.P.Vivekananda, learned counsel accepts notice for respondent Nos.1 to 3. 2. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a. Issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writs or orders or directions, directing the Respondent No.1 and 2 to consider the representation dated 29-01-2026, vide Annexure L submitted by the Petitioner in accordance with law; b. Grant such other and further relief as this Hon'ble Court deems fit to grant under the circumstances of the case in the interest of justice and equity. 3. A memo dated 17.02.2026 has been filed singed by the counsel for the petitioner, which reads as under: "It is submitted that the Respondents have already issued a tentative plan approval, therefore the Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to file fresh petition in the interest of justice and equity." 4. Accepting the said memo and submission of the counsel for the petitioner, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE GJM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 29