2026:JHHC:16781 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 4330 of 2026 Aftab Ansari, aged about 31 years, Son of Late Mukhtar Alam @ Mukhtar Mia. … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Mritunjay Chaudhary, Advocate For the Opp. Party-State : Mr. Rajneesh Vardhan, APP --- 02/11.06.2026 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 13.11.2025 in connection with Cyber Case No. 09 of 2026 (Arising out of Giridih Cyber P.S. Case No. 38 of 2025), for the alleged offence registered under Sections 111(2)(ii)/111(3)/111(4)/317(5)/319(2)/318(4)/338/336(3)/340(2)/3(5) of BNS & Section 66(B)/66(C)/66(D) of the Information Technology Act 2000, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge- II,cum-Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Giridih. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the bail application of the petitioner was permitted to be withdrawn vide order dated 08.04.2026 in B.A. No. 1530 of 2026 when this Court was not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail, with a liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the charge has been framed on 20.04.2026. He has stated in paragraph 18 of the bail application that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the co-accused namely Tafajul Ansari has been granted bail vide order dated 27.02.2026 by co-ordinate bench of this Court in B.A. No. 1023 of 2026. 2026:JHHC:16781 2 5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that since no counter affidavit has been filed, he is not in a position to say as to whether the petitioner is having any criminal antecedent or not. 6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the charge has already been framed and the co-accused has been enlarged on bail in B.A. No. 1023 of 2026 and as the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner having no criminal antecedent, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Giridih in connection with Cyber Case No. 09 of 2026 (arising out of Giridih Cyber P.S. Case No. 38 of 2025) on the following conditions: (i) The learned court shall call for the criminal antecedent report of the petitioner and, if any, criminal antecedent is found against the petitioner, the petitioner shall not be enlarged on bail. (ii) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (iii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iv) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (v) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (vi) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 2026:JHHC:16781 3 7. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 8. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘FAX/E-mail’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) 11.06.2026 Rakesh/- Uploaded on:-12.06.2026