[2026:RJ-JP:3785] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1573/2026 Jitendra Kumar Alias Jeetu S/o Shri Brajvardhan, Age About 32 Years, R/o Imali Wali Gali, Santar Road, Police Station Nihalganj, District Dholpur (Raj.) Presently R/o Kashi Naresh Ki Gali, Kila- gate Gwaliyar (MP). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sumit Kumar Jain For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Amit Punia, PP Mr. D.K. Dixit for Mr. Arpit Shirvastava HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 28/01/2026 1. This pre-arrest bail application under Section 482 of BNSS has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, who is having apprehension of his arrest in FIR No.81/2024 registered at Police Station Nihalganj, District Dholpur (Raj.) for offences punishable under Sections 143, 456, 394, 307 & 427 of IPC. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that there is omnibus allegation against the petitioner. Counsel submits that co-accused namely- Arvind Kumar Sharma & Aashish Sharma have already been granted benefit of anticipatory bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court and co- accused namely- Brajvardhan has been granted benefit of regular [2026:RJ-JP:3785] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1573/2026] bail this Court. It is submitted that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner. Custodial interrogation of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned State Counsel assisted by learned counsel for the complainant vehemently opposes the bail application. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that similar situated co-accused namely- Arvind Kumar Sharma & Aashish Sharma have already been granted benefit of anticipatory bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court and co-accused namely- Brajvardhan has been granted benefit of regular bail this Court; there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the anticipatory bail application. 6. The anticipatory bail application is allowed. 6. The anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Nihalganj, District Dholpur (Raj.) in FIR No.81/2024 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner- Jitendra Kumar Alias Jeetu S/o Shri Brajvardhan, he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Only) with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- [2026:RJ-JP:3785] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1573/2026] (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without prior permission of the court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /27