Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16332 (BOM)

THE DIVISISIONAL CONTROLLER MSRTC v. BHAGYASHREE CHAGAN KALE AND ORS

IA/394/2026 · 2026-10-06

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

59to62-Delay-IA-394-2026 (C).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION 59 INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 394 OF 2026 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 2225 OF 2026 The Divisional Controller MSRTC ...Applicant Versus Bhagyashree Chagan Kale And Ors ...Respondents 60 INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 419 OF 2026 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 2229 OF 2026 The Divisional Controller MSRTC ...Applicant Versus Janabai Devnarayan Kashid And Ors ...Respondents 61 INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 415 OF 2026 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 2235 OF 2026 The Divisional Controller MSRTC ...Applicant Versus Rajshree Sambhaji Mahingade And Ors ...Respondents 62 INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 417 OF 2026 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 2232 OF 2026 The Divisional Controller MSRTC ...Applicant Versus Arun Manikrao Mohare And Ors ...Respondents ….. Adv. Ketan Patil a/w Adv. Pinky Bhansali, Advocate for Applicant - MSRTC. Adv. R. S. Alange, Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 in I.A. No. 394 of 2026, 1 to 4 in I.A. No. 419 of 2026, 1 to 3 in I.A. No. 415 of ZIP 1 of 2 59to62-Delay-IA-394-2026 (C).doc 2026 and 1 and 2 in I.A. No. 417 of 2026. ….. CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. DATE : 06th OCTOBER, 2026. P.C. : By these applications, the applicant – Corporation is praying for condonation of delay. 2. No serious objections are raised by the respondents - claimants. 3. For the reasons stated in the applications, the applications are allowed and delay stands condoned. [ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.] ZIP 2 of 2