[2026:JHHC:16726] 1 Cr. M.P. No.1587 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.1587 of 2026 ------ Ashutosh Tiwary, Aged about 25 years, S/O- Bishwajit Tiwari, R/O-SSQ-93, Sijua Colony, Sijua, P.O.- Sijua, P.S.- Jogta, Dist- Dhanbad. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Pratiush Lala, Advocate. Mr. Deepak Sahu, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Mishra, A.P.P. ------ P R E S E N T HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY By the Court:- Heard the parties. 2. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 inter alia with twin prayers but at the outset it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner does not press the prayer to quash the order dated 13.03.2026 by which Non-Bailable Warrant of arrest was issued against the petitioner. 3. Accordingly, the prayer to quash the order dated 13.03.2026 is rejected as not pressed. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner confines his prayer to quash the order dated 30.04.2026 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Dhanbad whereby and whereunder the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Dhanbad has issued process under Section 82 of the Cr.P.C. Though the said provision has been repealed by Section 531 of the B.N.S.S, 2023 and the case was instituted in the year 2026 when the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 was no more in [2026:JHHC:16726] 2 Cr. M.P. No.1587 of 2026 force. Hence, it is submitted that the prayer as prayed for in this Cr.M.P. be allowed. 5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer and submits that the impugned order be treated as having been passed under Section 84 of the B.N.S.S., 2023. Hence, it is submitted that this Cr.M.P. being without any merit be dismissed. 6. Having heard the rival submissions made at the Bar and after carefully going through the materials available in the record, this Court has no hesitation in holding that since the F.I.R. was registered on 12.02.2026. Hence, the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Dhanbad ought not have exercised the power under Section 82 of the Cr.P.C. while passing the impugned order dated 30.04.2026 in connection with Dhanbad (Mahila) P.S. Case No. 05 of 2026. 7. Accordingly, the said order dated 30.04.2026 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Dhanbad in connection with Dhanbad (Mahila) P.S. Case No. 05 of 2026 is not sustainable in law, hence the same is liable to be quashed and set aside. 8. Accordingly, the said order dated 30.04.2026 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Dhanbad in connection with Dhanbad (Mahila) P.S. Case No. 05 of 2026 is quashed and set aside. 9. The learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Dhanbad may pass a fresh order in accordance with law. 10. In the result, this Cr.M.P. stands allowed to the aforesaid extent. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) High Court of Jharkhand, Ranchi Dated the 10th of June, 2026 AFR/ Amar Uploaded on 12/06/2026