Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16328 (AP)

Matangi Babu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/3205/2026 · 2026-02-17

B Krishna Mohan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010055822026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 3205/2026 Between: 1. MATANGI BABU,, S/O YESU, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 10-750, ANJANAPURAM, 10TH WARD, NADIKUDI VILLAGE, DACHEPALLE MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING. SECRETARY, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, DACHEPALLE MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT. 3. THE MANDAL SURVEYOR, DACHEPALLE MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd and 3rd respondents in not conducting the survey and demarcate the land situated in Sy.No. 1355/8o an extent of Ac.3.30 cents of Dachepalle Revenue Village and Mandal Palnadu District, pursuant to the F-Line Application FSNV012400583298, dated 20.11.2024 is highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to conduct the survey and demarcate the land situated in Sy.No. 1355/8 to an extent of Ac.3.30 cents of 2 BKM,J W.P.No.3205 of 2026 Dachepalle Revenue Village and Mandal, Palnadu District, pursuant to the F- Line Application FSNV012400583298, dated 20.11.2024 and pass s IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to conduct the survey and demarcate the land situated in Sy.No. 1355/8 to an extent of Ac.3.30 cents of Dachepalle Revenue Village and Mandal, Palnadu District, pursuant to the F- Line Application FSNV012400583298, dated 20.11.2024 pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V V N NARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 BKM,J W.P.No.3205 of 2026 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. 2. This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondents in not considering the Mee-seva application vide F-line Application No.FSNV012400583298 dated 20.11.2024 to conduct the survey of the agriculture land of the petitioner. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the written instructions of the 2nd respondent dated 03.02.2026 submits that already the F-line application of the petitioner was considered and necessary endorsement was issued by the Deputy Tahsildar dated 07.12.2024. 4. In view of the same, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. The said instructions shall be made as part of the Court record. 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 18.02.2026 PGT