Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7333 RFA No. 762 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.762 OF 2019 (PAR/INJ-) BETWEEN:
SMT.YELLAMMA W/O.LATE VENKATRAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS REPRESENTED BY GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SRI V.VENKATESHAIAH S/O.LATE VENKTARAYAPPA R/AT VASANTHAPURA VILLAGE SUBRAMANYA PURA POST BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU-560 061 …APPELLANT (BY SRI H.R.ANANTHAKRISHNAMURTHY, ADVOCATE) AND:
SRI UMESH S/O.SRI V.RAMU AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/AT VASANTHAPURA VILLAGE SUBRAMANYA PURA POST BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU-560 001 …RESPONDENT
THIS RFA FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC PRAYING TO SET-ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 08.03.2019 PASSED IN O.S.NO.26179/2009 BY XIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MAYOHALL UNIT, BENGALURU.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by B LAVANYA Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7333 RFA No. 762 of 2019
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for appellant has filed a memo stating that the appellant is no more. More than three (03) years have elapsed since the death of the sole appellant. He further submits that the suit is for bare injunction. The said memo is accepted. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as abated. In view of dismissal of the appeal, pending interlocutory applications, do not survive for consideration.
SD/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE
LB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15