Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Rajasthan · body
2026 DAILYLAW 16323 (RAJ)
SMT. ISHWARI BAI W/O LATE SHRI TARACHAND v. SMT. GYANA BAI W/O SHRI MANSHARAM
CSA/116/2024 · 2026-01-30
Shubha Mehta
body2026
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16323 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16323 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 116/2024
1. Smt. Ishwari Bai W/o Late Shri Tarachand, R/o 22/382, Nawab Ka Beda, Ajmer (Deceased)
2. Shri Kanhaiyalal S/o Late Shri Tara Chand, R/o 22/382, Nawab Ka Beda, Ajmer (Deceased) Through Legal Heirs- (A) Smt. Reshma W/o Late Shri Kanhaiyalal (B) Ku. Sangeeta D/o Late Shri Kanhaiyalal (C) Ku. Pratigya D/o Late Shri Kanhaiyalal (D) Krishan S/o Late Shri Kanhaiyalal (Ku. Pratigya And Krishan Both Minor Through Mother And Natural Guardian Smt. Reshma)
3. Shri Ashok S/o Late Shri Tarachand, R/o 22/382, Nawab Ka Beda, Ajmer. ----Appellants Versus
1. Smt. Gyana Bai W/o Shri Mansharam, R/o 18/74, Mundri Mohalla, Kharikui, Ajmer. 2. Shri Sewakram S/o Shri Mansharam, R/o 18/74, Mundri Mohalla, Kharikui, Ajmer. 3. Shri Harish Kumar S/o Shri Mansharam, R/o 18/74, Mundri Mohalla, Kharikui, Ajmer. 4. Smt. Sushila W/o Shri Chandra Kumar D/o Shri Mansharam, R/o 18/74, Mundri Mohalla, Kharikui, Ajmer. 5. Shri Khoobchand S/o Shri Mansharam, R/o 18/74, Mundri Mohalla, Kharikui, Ajmer. 6. Chanda D/o Shri Mansharam, R/o 18/74, Mundri Mohalla, Kharikui, Ajmer. 7. Gayatri D/o Shri Mansharam, R/o 18/74, Mundri Mohalla, Kharikui, Ajmer. 8. Shri Inder Kumar S/o Shri Mansharam, R/o 18/74, Mundri Mohalla, Kharikui, Ajmer. 9. Shri Laxman S/o Shri Mansharam, R/o 18/74, Mundri Mohalla, Kharikui, Ajmer. 10. Shri Arjun S/o Shri Mansharam, R/o 18/74, Mundri Mohalla, Kharikui, Ajmer. 11. Shri Ramchandra S/o Shri Metharam, R/o 22/263, Nawab Ka Beda, Ajmer Deceased Through His Legal Heirs- (A)
(2 of 8) [CSA-116/2024] Smt. Geeta Devi W/o Late Shri Ramchandra (B) Shri Sunil Kumar S/o Late Shri Ramchandra (C) Shri Mukesh S/o Late Shri Ramchandra (D) Smt. Pinki D/o Late Shri Ramchandra (E) Smt. Seela D/o Late Shri Ramchandra (F) Smt. Meena D/o Late Shri Ramchandra R/o 56, Gurunanak Colony, Dhola Bhata, Ajmer. 12. Shri Harish S/o Shri Tarachand, R/o 22/363, Nawab Ka Beda, Ajmer. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Akshay Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Goyal HON'BLE MRS.
JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA Order 1- Date on which the judgment was reserved : 09/01/2026 2- Date of Pronouncement : 30 / 01/2026 ;g flfoy f}rh; vihy vihykFkhZ@izfroknhx.k us fopkj.k U;k;ky; ofj"B flfoy U;k;k/kh'k ¼d0[k0½ ,oa U;kf;d eftLVªsV] dze&5 vtesj }kjk okn la[;k 97@1993 muokuh Jherh Kku ckbZ cuke jkepUnz o vU; esa ikfjr fu.kZ; ,oa fMdzh fnukafdr 27-07-2001 ¼ftlds }kjk izR;FkhZ@oknhx.k dk okn fMdzh fd;k x;k½ rFkk mlds fo:) izLrqr flfoy izFke vihy la[;k 19@2016 ¼137@12] 201@2001½ esa izFke vihyh; U;k;ky; vij ftyk ,oa lS'ku U;k;k/kh'k] dze&1] vtesj }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; ,oa fMdzh fnukafdr 18-10-2023 ¼ftlds }kjk izfroknhx.k dh vihy fujLr dh xbZ½ ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh gSA izdj.k ds rF; la{ksi esa bl izdkj gS fd ,d okn izR;FkhZ@oknhx.k dh vksj ls vf/kfu"dklu ifjlj ,oa cdk;k fdjk;s dk vihykFkhZ@izfroknhx.k ds fo:) izLrqr dj izfroknhx.k }kjk dh xbZ fdjk;k vnk;xh esa pwd ,oa oknhx.k y{e.k o vtqZu dh futh ,oa ln~Hkkoh vko';drk ds vk/kkj ij fookfnr ifjlj dk vf/kfu"dklu pkgk x;kA okni= esa oknhx.k y{e.k ,oa vtqZu ds O;olk; ds fy, fookfnr ifjlj] tks fd nks nqdkus gSa] dh vko';drk crkbZ xbZ gSA (3 of 8) [CSA-116/2024] fopkj.k U;k;ky; us oknksRrj izLrqr gksus ds mijkUr fook|d fuLrkfjr djrs gq, oknhx.k dh ;qfDr;qDr vkSj ln~Hkkoh vko';drk izekf.kr ekudj vf/kfu"dklu ifjlj dh fMdzh ikfjr dh gSA mDr fu.kZ; ,oa fMdzh dks izfroknhx.k }kjk izFke vihyh; U;k;ky; esa pqukSrh nh xbZA izFke vihyh; U;k;ky; us nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl lquus ds mijkUr fookfnr ifjlj esa y{e.k vkSj vtqZu ds fy, O;olk; dh vko';drk dks ;qfDr;qDr ,oa ln~Hkkoh izekf.kr ik;k vkSj vihy fujLr dj nhA mDr nksuksa fu.kZ;ksa vkSj fMdzh ds fo:) vihykFkhZ@izfroknhx.k us ;g flfoy f}rh; vihy izLrqr dh gSA vihy dh xzkg~;rk ds laca/k esa lquk x;kA vihykFkhZ&izfroknhx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk rdZ gS fd fopkj.k U;k;ky; vkSj izFke vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk fook|d dze&4] tks fd oknhx.k dh futh ,oa ;qfDr;qDr ln~Hkkoh vko';drk ls lacaf/kr gS] ij tks fu"d"kZ fn;k x;k gS] og izdj.k esa miyC/k lk{; vkSj fof/k ds loZFkk fo:) gSA mudk rdZ gS fd oknh y{e.k] ftldh futh vko';drk crkbZ xbZ gS] og izdj.k esa ijhf{kr gh ugha gqvk gS vkSj ,slh fLFkfr esa bldh vko';drk dks izekf.kr ugha ekuk tk ldrk gSA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd izLrqr lk{; ls ;g Li"V gS fd okn izLrqr djrs le; vU; oknh vtqZu] ftldh ifjlj gsrq vko';drk crkbZ xbZ gS] og ek= lk<+s 18 o"kZ dk fo|kFkhZ FkkA
Hkfo"; esa mRiUu gksus okyh fdlh izdkj dh vko';drk dks ln~Hkkoh vko';drk ugha ekuk tk ldrk gSA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd vihy ds nkSjku mUgksaus vkns'k 41 fu;e 27 lhihlh ds izko/kkuksa ds vUrxZr y{e.k ds fookg dk dkMZ izLrqr fd;k gS] ftlesa mldk nqcbZ ds ?kj vkSj dk;kZy; nksuksa dk irk vafdr gS] blls Li"V gS fd mls vtesj esa oknxzLr nqdku dh O;oklk; gsrq dksbZ vko';drk ugha gSA fopkj.k U;k;ky; vkSj vihyh; U;k;ky;] nksuksa gh us mDr egRoiw.kZ lk{; vkSj lkjHkwr rF;ksa ij /;ku fn;s fcuk gh vkSj bUgsa utjvankt djrs gq, fook|d dze&4 ds lca/k esa fu.kZ; ikfjr fd;k gS] tks loZFkk fof/k fo:) gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa mDr flfoy f}rh; esa fof/k dk lkjoku~ iz'u fufgr gS] vr% vihy lquokbZ gsrq xzg.k dh tkosA (4 of 8) [CSA-116/2024] blds foijhr izR;FkhZ@fMdzhnkj ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk rdZ gS fd fMdzh dh vuqikyuk esa mUgsa fookfnr ifjlj dk vkf/kiR; btjk; esa izkIr gks pqdk gSA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd y{e.k ,oa vtqZu ds O;olk; ds fy, futh ,oa ln~Hkkoh vko';drk gsrq ;g okn izLrqr fd;k x;k FkkA vtqZu us vius vkSj vius HkkbZ y{e.k dh futh vko';drk dks Hkyh&Hkkafr izekf.kr fd;k gSA lkFk gh muds cM+s HkkbZ lsodjke] tks Hkh oknh gS vkSj ihMCY;w 1 ds :i esa ijhf{kr gqvk gS] us Hkh bl laca/k esa viuh fo'oluh; lk{; nsdj futh o ln~Hkkoh vko';drk izekf.kr dh gSA mudk rdZ gS fd vtqZu us vius dFku esa Li"Vr% o"kZ 1994 esa ch-dkWe- ikl dj ysuk dgk gS vkSj ,slh fLFkfr esa mldh O;olk; djus dh mez gks pqdh FkhA mlus lk{; esa O;olk; dk vuqHko gksuk Hkh izekf.kr fd;k gSA mudk rdZ gS fd y{e.k] tks fd csjkstxkj Fkk vkSj mlds ikl O;olk; gsrq LFkku miyC/k ugha Fkk] bl dkj.k ukSdjh djus gsrq nqcbZ x;k FkkA mudk rdZ gS fd ifjlj fjDr ugha gks] rks vko';drk j[kus okyk O;fDr fdlh izdkj dk dksbZ dk;Z ugha
djsa] ,slk LokHkkfod ugha ekuk tk ldrk gS vkSj ;g visf{kr Hkh ugha gSA mudk rdZ gS fd O;olk; ds fy, tc y{e.k dks ifjlj miyC/k ugha Fkk] rks mls vkthfodk ds fy, etcwju nqcbZ tkdj dk;Z djuk iM+k vkSj blls futh ,oa ln~Hkkfod vko';drk foijhrr% izHkkfor ugha gksrh gSA mudk rdZ gS fd fopkj.k U;k;ky; vkSj izFke vihyh; U;k;ky; us lk{; dk lE;d~ foospu djus ds mijkUr gh fook|d dze&4 ij fu.kZ; fn;k gSA mudk rdZ gS fd dksbZ Hkh flfoy f}rh; vihy fof/k ds lkjoku~ iz'u ds miyC/k gksus ds vk/kkj ij gh xzkg~; dh tk ldrh gS rFkk lk{; dk iquewZY;kadu vuqer ugha gSA mudk rdZ gS fd nksuksa U;k;ky;ksa us lk{; dk leqfpr ewY;kadu lgh izdkj ls fd;k gS] ftlesa dksbZ voS/krk ugha gS vkSj ,slh fLFkfr esa vihy esa fof/k dk dksbZ lkjoku~ iz'u vUroZfyr ugha gSA vr% flfoy f}rh; vihy xzkg~; fd;s tkus ;ksX; ugha gS] fujLr dh tkosA geus mHk;i{k ds rdksZa ij euu fd;kA i=koyh dk /;kuiwoZd v/;;u fd;k x;kA vihykFkhZ@izfroknhx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk eq[; rdZ ;g jgk gS fd fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; us bl rF; ij dksbZ /;ku gh ugha fn;k gS fd (5 of 8) [CSA-116/2024] ftl ,d O;fDr y{e.k dh futh ,oa ln~Hkkoh vko';drk fookfnr nqdku esa ls ,d nqdku dh crkbZ xbZ gS] og lk{; esa mifLFkr gh ugha gqvk gS vkSj mlus viuh vko';drk dks izekf.kr ugha fd;k gSA mudk f}rh; rdZ ;g jgk gS fd nwljh nqdku dh futh ,oa ln~Hkkoh vko';drk oknh vtqZu ds fy, crkbZ xbZ gS] tks okn izLrqr djrs le; lk<+s 18 o"kZ dh vk;q dk v/;ujr fo|kFkhZ Fkk vkSj Hkfo"; esa mRiUu gksus okyh vko';drk ds vk/kkj ij vf/kfu"dklu ifjlj dh fMdzh ikfjr ugha dh tk ldrh gS rFkk bl laca/k esa mDr nksuksa gh lkjoku iz'u U;k;ky; ds le{k fu.kZ;kFkZ miyC/k gSA vr% flfoy f}rh; vihy xzkg~; dh tkosA tgka rd vihykFkhZx.k ds izFke rdZ dk iz'u gS] rks
mudk mDr rdZ Lohdkj ugha fd;k tk ldrk gSA nksuksa gh U;k;ky;ksa us mDr nqdkuksa esa O;olk; djus gsrq oknhx.k dh futh ,oa ln~Hkkoh vko';drk izekf.kr ikbZ gS vkSj bl laca/k esa mudk leorhZ fu"d"kZ gSA tgka rd ,d oknh y{e.k dk lk{; esa ugha vkus dk iz'u gS] rks ;g rdZ Lohdkjs tkus ;ksX; ugha gS fd og Lo;a vkdj gh viuh vo';drk dks izekf.kr dj ldrk FkkA mYys[kuh; gS fd fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k oknh lsodjke ¼tks fd vtqZu o y{ke.k dk cM+k HkkbZ gS½ rFkk Lo;a vtqZu us ihMCY;w 1 o 2 ds :i esa ijhf{kr gksdj vtqZu o y{ke.k ds fy, nqdkuksa dh vko';drk gksuk crk;k gSA dksbZ Hkh lxk cM+k HkkbZ vius NksVs HkkbZ ds O;olk; gsrq futh ,oa ln~Hkkoh vko';drk dks izekf.kr dj ldrk gSA mYys[kuh; gS fd bl laca/k esa nksuksa gh lk{khx.k ds tks dFku] vtqZu o y{ke.k dh futh ,oa ln~Hkkoh vko';drk ds laca/k esa jgs gSa] os fo'oluh; jgs gSa vkSj fdlh Hkh :i esa [kf.Mr ugha gks lds gSaA ;g Hkh mYys[kuh; gS fd dsoy okn yfEcr jgus ds nkSjku mDr oknh y{e.k dk nqcbZ tkdj vU;= O;olk; vkSj dk;Z djus ls ;g ugha ekuk tk ldrk gS fd mldh vko';drk mDr nqdku ds fy, lekIr gks xbZ gSA bl laca/k esa bl U;k;ky; dh led{k ihB }kjk Ravindra Kumar vs. M/s. Shrinath Complex 2012 2 DNJ 1028 esa ;g fu.khZr fd;k x;k gS fd& "It is correct that Bhikchand was unemployed on the date of filing of the suit but he could not be expected to idle away the time by remaining unemployed till the case is finally decided. It has already
(6 of 8) [CSA-116/2024] taken 25 years.
Therefore, we do not think that taking up contractor work, in the meanwhile, will militate against his carrying on the business of Kirana which is his family business, which was carried on by his father and is being carried on by his brother independently....... In our view, none of the reasons leads to the interference that Bhikchand cannot be denied to the landlady to recover the suit premises for personal requirement of Bhikchand to establish Kirana business independently." lkFk gh fdlh Hkh O;fDr ls ;g vis{kk ugha dh tk ldrh gS fd og U;kf;d izdj.kksa ds fuLrkj.k dk bUrtkj djrk jgs vkSj viuh vkthfodk ds fy, dksbZ dk;Z ugha djsaA ,slh fLFkfr esa gekjs fopkj ls tks lk{; vkbZ gS] mlls oknxzLr nqdkuksa ds laca/k esa oknhx.k y{e.k ,oa vtqZu dh vko';drk futh ,oa ln~Hkkoh gksuk izekf.kr gqbZ gSA tgka rd oknh vtqZu ds laca/k esa oknxzLr nqdku dh Hkfo"; dh vko';drk ds laca/k esa vihykFkhZ ds rdZ dk iz'u gS] rks ;g ugha ekuk tk ldrk gS fd lk<+s 18 o"kZ dk O;fDr] tks fd Lukrd ds vafre o"kZ dk fo|kFkhZ gS] mls O;olk; gsrq fudV Hkfo"; esa oknxzLr nqdku dh vko';drk ugha gksA ;g Hkh mYys[kuh; gS fd blh lk{kh us U;k;ky; eas mifLFkr gksdj Lo;a dks O;olk; dk vuqHko j[kuk dgk gS vkSj dgk gS fd mls O;olk; gsrq futh ,oa ln~Hkkoh vko';drk gSA bl laca/k esa fofHkUu mPp U;k;ky;ksa us U;kf;d fofu'p;ksa esa fuEukuqlkj fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k gS&
1. T Sunil Kumar vs. M/s S.G. Edulgri and Sons, AIR 1993 Andhra Pradesh 205
"11. As the petitioners were studying at the time of filing of the petition and as one of them was a minor, it was contended that there was no bona fide requirement of the premises at the time when they filed the petition for eviction. It is not necessary that the need for starting business should exist on the date of suit and the plaintiff can
(7 of 8) [CSA-116/2024] file a suit in respect of his requirement which is to be in near future vide Hemran Nima v. Rajnarayan, 1980 MP RCJ 65.
In another decision reported in 1974 RCR between Padma Rammurthy v. M. Ragha, 1974 RCR (Hyd.) 197, it held that, it is true that the need for personal occupation must be present, but it cannot also be lost sight of the fact that disposal of rent cases do take time and, therefore, a petition filed in the year 1969 for requirement of premises in 1971 on the ground that the landlord would retire and thereafter he wishes to settle down, cannot be dismissed that the need is not present. 12. It is a matter of common knowledge that proceedings for eviction of a tenant cannot be finalized at least within a period of five years if there is contest between the parties. So, if a party who is aware of the nature of the proceedings filed an application for eviction on the basis of bona fide requirement which may come into existence in future cannot be punished by refusing to entertain such petition on the ground that the need is not present when he filed the petition. It should be remembered that this petition for eviction was filed in the year 1979 but still the same has not been finally disposed of. After all the petitioners were studying intermediate at the time when the petition was filed."
2. Omprakash Bhati vs. Lrs. of Har Kanwar 2012 1 RLW (Raj.) 360
"21. It may be stated that there is no quarrel on the proposition that bonafide need has to be reasonable and objectively considered and established by the landlord, but at the same time need to exist at the time of filing of the suit is not a straight jacket formula.
Such need may arise in reasonably near future as already observed above."
(8 of 8) [CSA-116/2024] bl izdkj izFke rks oknh vtqZu dh vko';drk dks Hkfo"; dh vko';drk ekuk gh ugha tk ldrk gSA f}rh; oSls Hkh okn ds yfEcr jgus ds nkSjku mldh vk;q yxHkx 27 o"kZ gks pqdh Fkh vkSj r`rh; ;g fd fudV Hkfo"; esa mRiUUk gksus okyh vko';drk gsrq Hkh vf/kfu"dklu ifjlj ds fy, okn izLrqr fd;k tk ldrk gS] tSlk fd Åij of.kZr fofu'p;ksa esa fu.khZr fd;k x;k gSA fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; vkSj izFke vihyh; U;k;ky; us i=koyh ij miyC/k nksuksa i{kksa dh vksj ls izLrqr lk{; ij leqfpr :i ls fopkj djus ds mijkUr oknhx.k dh mDr nksuksa nqdku ds fy, futh ,oa ln~Hkkoh vko';drk izekf.kr ikbZ gS vkSj muds bl fu"d"kZ esa fdlh izdkj dh dksbZ vuqfprrk ;k voS/krk ugha gSA mi;qZDr foospu vuqlkj bl flfoy f}rh; vihy esa fdlh izdkj dk dksbZ fof/k dk lkjoku~ iz'u fu.kZ; ds fy, mRiUu ugha gksrk gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa ;g flfoy f}rh; vihy xzkg~;rk ds izdze ij fujLr fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA ifj.kker% vihykFkhZ@izfroknhx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g flfoy f}rh; vihy fujLr dh tkrh gSA rn~uqlkj fofo/k izkFkZuki=] ;fn dksbZ yfEcr gks] rks fujLr fd;s tkrs gSaA (SHUBHA MEHTA),J VISHAL SHARMA /102