Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16320 (JHR)

VINOD KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/360/2025 · 2026-06-09

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:16997 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Contempt (Cvl) Case No. 360 of 2025 ---- Vinod Kumar, aged about 54 years, son of Late Lakshaman Prasad, resident of Govindpur, P.O and P.S Govindpur, District Dhanbad. .......Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Mr. Praveen Kumar Toppo, the Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi, having its office at Project Building, P.O Dhurwa, P.S Jagannathpur, District Ranchi. 3. Md. Asif Hassan, the Joint Secretary, Department of Personnel Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi, having its office at Project Building, P.O Dhurwa, P.S Jagannathpur, District Ranchi. 4. Mr. Sunil Kumar, the Under Secretary, Department of Personnel Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi, having its office at Project Building, P.O Dhurwa, P.S Jagannathpur, District Ranchi. .....Respondents --- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Saurabh Shekhar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Ashwini Bhushan, AC to Sr. SC-II --- 07/ Dated: 09.06.2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the order passed by the Writ Court reasoned order has been passed, as such the instant application may be disposed of by giving opportunity to the petitioner to assail the reasoned order. 2. Having regard to the above, the instant application stands disposed of, with the liberty as prayed for. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 09.06.26 Abha/-