Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:3852] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1580/2026 Hemraj S/o Brijmohan, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Odpura Basti, Baran Police Station Kotwali Baran, District Baran (Raj.) (Accused At Present Confined In District Jail, Baran) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anubodh Subodh Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 28/01/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.163/2023 registered at Police Station Kotwali Baran, District Baran for the offence(s) under Sections 306 read with Section 34 of IPC.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the other similarly placed co-accused Dwarka Bai has already been enlarged on bail by the co-ordinate Bench vide order dated 01.12.2025. There is no evidence that soon before the death of deceased, deceased was subjected to cruelty by the petitioner or that deceased was instigated to commit suicide. There are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner. It is further contended that the petitioner is in custody since long and charge-sheet has already been submitted before the concerned Court, the trial of the case may take considerable time,
[2026:RJ-JP:3852] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1580/2026] therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and contended that the deceased suicidal note categorically stated that the petitioner used to harass her continuously after the death of her husband and also used to beat her, therefore, considering the allegations stated in the suicide note, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed.
4. Heard and perused the material available on record.
5. It is not desirable to express anything on the merits of the case. Considering the period of long incarceration of the petitioner and the fact that charge-sheet has already been submitted before the concerned Court and other similarly placed co-accused Dwarka Bai has already been enlarged on bail, therefore, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Hemraj S/o Brijmohan, in connection with FIR No.163/2023 registered at Police Station Kotwali Baran, District Baran, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/Rashmi/13