Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16307 (RAJ)

SMT. POONAM SHARMA W/O SHRI HIRA CHAND SHARMA v. BALMUKUND SONI S/O KANHIYA LAL SONI

CFA/114/2019 · 2026-02-17

Maneesh Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:7485] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 114/2019 Smt. Poonam Sharma W/o Shri Hira Chand Sharma, R/o House No. 2334 Ram Lalla Ji Ka Rasta Shishe Walo Ki Gali Johri Bazar Jaipur ----Appellant Versus Balmukund Soni S/o Kanhiya Lal Soni, R/o House No. 293 Hira Colony Laxmi Nagar Mangodi Walo Ki Bagichi Ke Piche Brahmpuri Jaipur ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Satyam Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mohammed Anees HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 17/02/2026 1. Learned counsel for the parties submits that vide the impugned order dated 17.10.2015, on the joint request of the parties, the matter was referred to the Mediation Centre situated at the Rajasthan High Court Premises, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur. Pursuant to the said direction, the parties appeared before the Mediation Centre, and as per the mediation report bearing No. 4695/2025 dated 01.12.2025, the mediation between the parties was successful. 2. Heard learned counsel for both the parties and perused the record of the case. 3. From a bare perusal of the record, it is evident that before the Mediation Centre, the parties to the appeal have filed a compromise petition dated 26.11.2025, whereby they have settled their various disputes as enumerated in the settlement deed. 4. The relevant terms of the compromise qua the present appeal is reproduced as under: [2026:RJ-JP:7485] (2 of 2) [CFA-114/2019] ^^ 6- ;g fd i{kdkjku ds }kjk vkilh lgefr ls ;g r; ik;k gS fd izFke i{k] f}rh; i{k dks mijksDr of.Zkr lEifr ds fookn ds fuLrkj.k isVs dqy 11]00]000@&¼X;kjg yk[k :i;s½ vnk djsA mDr jkf'k esa ls 4]06]000@& v{kjs pkj yk[k N% gtkj :i;s dh jkf'k tfj;s fMekaM Mªk¶V la[;k 881222 fnukafdr 09-09-2025 cSad & dksVd efganzk cSad 'kk[kk tkSgjh cktkj] t;iqj izFke i{k us f}rh; i{k dks vnk dj nh gS rFkk 'ks"k jkf'k 6]94]000@& v{kjs N% yk[k pkSjkuos gtkj :i;s izFke i{k us f}rh; i{k dks udn vnk dj fn;s gS] ftls f}rh; i{k izkIr djuk Lohdkj djrk gSA 7- ;g fd izFke i{k ,oa f}rh; i{k ds }kjk bl jkthukesa ds ek/;e ls ;g Hkh r; ik;k gS fd izFke i{k dh ekrk ds }kjk nk;j flfoy izFke vihy la[;k 114@2019 muokuh Jherh iwue 'kekZ cuke ckyeqdqUn lksuh dks i{kdkjku jkthukek izLrqr dj ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; t;iqj ds le{k vf/kuLFk U;k;ky; dk vkns'k vikLr djok dj jkthukek ds vk/kkj ij fMdzh djok ysaxsA blds i'pkr izFke i{k ds LokfeRo o ekfydkuk gd dh lEifr edku uEcj 2329] ¼u;k uEcj 2334½ jkeyyk th dk jkLrk] 'kh'ks okyksa dh xyh] tkSgjh cktkj] t;iqj ls f}rh; i{k vFkok mlds okfjlku] ,ts.V bR;kfn dk dksbZ lEcU/k o ljksdkj ugha jgsxkA 8- ;g fd f}rh; i{k }kjk mDr fu.kZ; fnukad 03-12-2018 dh ikyuk ckcr ,d btjk; la[;k 15@2021 muokuh ckyeqdqUn cuke Jherh iwue 'kekZ o vU; izLrqr dj j[kh gS tks U;k;ky; vij ftyk ,oa l= U;k;k/kh'k] dze&2] t;iqj egkuxj ¼f}rh;½ esa fopkjk/khu Fkh] ftls f}rh; i{k us foMªk dj fy;k gSA Hkfo"; esa mDr vkns'k fnukad 03-12-2018 dh vuqikyuk esa f}rh; i{k fdlh izdkj dh dksbZ btjk; fdlh Hkh U;k;ky; esa izLrqr ugha djsxk] uk gh fdlh vU; izdkj dh dksbZ dk;Zokgh djsxkA** 5. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances; the mediation report dated 01.12.2025 as well as the compromise dated 26.11.2025, the present Civil First Appeal stands allowed and the impugned judgment and decree dated 17.10.2015 is set aside. 6. The stay application and other pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J Seema/13