GUDDI KANWAR W/O LATE JASWANT SINGH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/1436/2026 · 2026-02-11
Sandeep Taneja
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16304 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16304 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:6481] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1436/2026 Guddi Kanwar W/o Late Jaswant Singh, R/o House No. 2-N-54, Mahaveer Nagar Vistar Yojna, Police Station Mahaveer Nagar, Kota, at Present Tenant in the House Of Rahul Saxena Ji, Nagar Tent House Ki Gali, Rangbadi, Near Balaji Talab, Rangbadi, Police Station Mahaveer Nagar, Kota. (At Present In Central Jail, Kota). ----Petitioner Versus The State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jagdish Singh Chauhan Mr. Vikram Singh Panwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA
Order 11/02/2026
1. The present bail application has been filed by the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with F.I.R. No.0383/2025 registered at Police Station Borkhera, District Kota City for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 308(6) and 308(7) of BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and has nothing to do with the alleged offences and the alleged offences are triable by magistrate and bailable in nature. Despite the offences under Section(s) 308(6) and 308(7) of BNS being bailable, the learned Sessions Judge has committed a grave error in rejecting the bail application. Counsel also submits that charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter; the petitioner is in custody since long and conclusion of trial will take considerable time, so no fruitful
[2026:RJ-JP:6481] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1436/2026] purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner into custody, and therefore prays to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by
learned counsel for the petitioner herein above.
4. Taking into consideration the overall facts & circumstances of the case; the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, the fact that the alleged offences are triable by magistrate; bailable in nature; the charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter and trial will take considerable long time in its conclusion, without commenting anything upon the merits / demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
5. Therefore, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and the accused-petitioner, namely Guddi Kanwar W/o Late Jaswant Singh, is ordered to be released on bail, provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when he is called upon to do so.
(SANDEEP TANEJA),J AVINASH GULERIA /46