[2026:JHHC:16839] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5078 of 2026 ------ Shadab Hussain @ Shadab Siddique @ Sadab Sidique aged aobut 33 years, son of Ali Rajak @ Ali Raja, resident of Near Urdu School, Pahadi Mohalla, P.O. & P.S.- Town Daltonganj, District Palamau .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra Shankar Singh, Advocate Ms. Shabina Perween, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-11-06-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Chainpur P.S. Case No.94 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed murder of the son of the informant namely Ali Hussain. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that except suspicion, there is no other material available in the record to implicate the petitioner in this case. It is further submitted that the son of the deceased namely Rehan Hussain, whose statement appears in para-49 of the case-diary, has categorically stated that the deceased has committed suicide and the same is corroborated in the post- mortem report. It is next submitted that the deceased was suffering from obsessive disorder and was under treatment with a Doctor who is a Neuro-psychiatrist. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-13 of the bail application. It is also submitted that the petitioner is a public servant being a Field Manager in the Office of D.E.O., Collectorate, Palamau. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 05.05.2026 as is evident from para-15 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Palamau in connection with Chainpur P.S. Case No.94 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 11.06.2026 Saroj/