APHC010054342026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 382/2026 Between: 1. MALLIDI RAMA DEVI,, W/O. SRINIVASA REDDY,D/O. LATE. PADALA SATYANARAYANA REDDY,FEMALE, HOUSE WIFE, AGED 42 YEARS, D.NO.2-16-7, RANGALA VARI STREET, ALCOT GARDENS, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, 2. PADALA AJAY PRAKASH,, S/O. LATE.SATYANARAYANA REDDY, MALE. AGED 44 YEARS,EMPLOYEE IN U.S.A. REP. POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER,MALLIDI RAMA DEVI, W/O. SRINIVASA REDDY,D/O. LATE. PADALA SATYANARAYANA REDDY,FEMALE, HOUSE WIFE, AGED 42 YEARS, D.NO.2-16-7, RANGALA VARI STREET, ALCOT GARDENS, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. VELAGALA SAROJINI, W/O.SRINIVASA REDDY, FEMALE, AGED 41, YEARS, INAM, D.NO.8-152, REDDY KALYANA MANDAPAM STREET, MARUTERU- 534122, PENUMANTRA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. CELL 8367235971. 2. PADALA NAGA MANI, W/O. LATE. SATYANARAYANA REDDY, FEMALE. AGED 56 YEARS, D.NO.2-143, RAJULA VEEDHI, UBALANKA-534 237,.RAVULAPALEM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to set aside the order dated 3-1-2026 of the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Tanuku, West Godavari District in S.R.No.4427/2025 in O.S.No.43/2022 and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to grant stay the order dated 03-01-2026 of the Civil Judge ( Senior Division),Tanuku,West Godavari District in S.R.No.4427/2025 in O.S.No.43/2022 and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. PECHATHY RANGA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that now the trial Court has already disposed of the main petition and hence no further orders are required to be passed in the C.R.P. and prayed to dismiss the same as infructuous. In view of the same, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH 25.02.2026 RD 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.382 OF 2026 25.02.2026 RD