IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 115 CWP-12202-2026 DATE OF DECISION: 23.04.2026 UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS …Petitioners Versus JAGMAL SINGH AND ANOTHER ... Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Present: Mr. Ravindra Pal Singh, Senior Panel Counsel for the petitioners-UOI. **** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that an important fact that before passing of the order by the Central Administrative Tribunal (for short – the ‘Tribunal’), the charge-sheet has already been issued to the respondents, has not been mentioned, which is very material hence, the present petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further, with liberty to file a review before the Tribunal keeping in view the said fact which has escaped the notice of the Tribunal while passing the order. Ordered accordingly. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE (DEEPAK MANCHANDA) 23.04.2026 JUDGE sapna adhikari Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No KUMARI SAPNA 2026.04.24 09.46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document