Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010058172026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] THURSDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 3333/2026 Between:
1. DOPPASANI VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O. SIDDI RAJU AGED 45 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. VEERABHADRAVARAM T.
NARSAPURAM MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 522237
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ELURU DISTRICT AT ELURU 534001
3. THE TAHSILDAR, T NARSAPURAM MANDAL ELURU DISTRICT 534002
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS by declaring the action of the 3rd respondent threatening to delete my name in revenue records in respect of land admeasuring Ac. 1.90cents in Sy No. 335-2A, and land admeasuring Ac. 1.30cents in Sy No. 338-2 of Velagapaudu Village, T Narsapuram Village, Eluru District without following the procedure laid down under A.P Rights in Land and Pattadar pass books Act 1971 is illegal, arbitrary and
2 BKM,J W.P.No.3333 of 2026
unconstitutional and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to follow due process of law in the interest of Justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 3rd respondent not to delete the name of petitioner in record of Rights in respect of land admeasuring Ac. I.OOcents in Sy No. 335- 2A, and land admeasuring Ac. 1.30cents in Sy No. 338-2 of Velagapaudu Village, T Narsapuram Village, Eluru District pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. M P V N V SASTRI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
3 BKM,J W.P.No.3333 of 2026
The Court made the following Order:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. 2.
This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the 3rd respondent in threatening to delete the petitioner’s name in the revenue records in respect of the land admeasuring Ac.1.90 cents in Sy.No.335-2A and land admeasuring Ac.1.30 cents in Sy.No.338-2 of Velagapaudu Village, T Narsapuram Village, Eluru District without following the procedure laid down under the A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the written instructions of the 3rd respondent dated 11.02.2026 submits that the petitioner continues to be in possession of the petition schedule lands and no order has been passed by the 3rd respondent deleting or proposing to delete the petitioner’s name from the revenue records. 4. In view of the same, recording the said instructions of the 3rd respondent, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. The said written instructions shall be made as part of the Court record. 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 BKM,J W.P.No.3333 of 2026
As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN
19.02.2026 PGT