IN TH 130 Satbeer Ka Des Raj an CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU review of Court. Court :- RA-CR-38-2026 in CR-2197-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR RA-CR-38-2026 Civil Revision No Date of decision eer Kaur …..App Versus Raj and others AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Review Applicant-Petitioner S HI GUPTA J. (Oral) The present review applicati w of order dated 09.03.2026 (Anne On 09.3.2026, the following “Prayer in the p for issuance of direction District Judge, Kuruk for deciding the applica 622-2024 (Annexure P Petitioner Satbe person. She submits tha effectively prosecute th without legal assistanc that a Legal Aid Counse her in the present matte 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 2026 in ion No.2197 of 2026 cision :-02.04.2026 Applicant-Petitioner …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA ioner Satbeer Kaur in person. plication has been filed seeking (Annexure P-1) passed by this owing order was passed by this the present revision petition is ctions to the learned Additional urukshetra/Appellate Authority plication for stay bearing CM- e P-5) in a time bound manner. atbeer Kaur is present in s that she is not in a position to te the present revision petition tance and, therefore, requests unsel be appointed to represent matter. She further submits that VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.02 18.40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document RA-CR-38-2026 in CR-2197-2026 Ms. Manvi Verma, Ad Court and is already Counsel for her in tw appointed as Legal Aid the present case also. The request mad to be genuine and reas Advocate, who is pres she has no objection to Aid Counsel in the pr Ms. Manvi Verma, Adv as Legal Aid Counsel present case. The Secretary, Authority (DLSA) conce the appointment of th ensure that the admissi as per the applicable Rules and Schedule o appointed Legal Aid Co the present case. At this stage, lear the petitioner submits th apparent in the draftin petition, which requir incorporation of nec therefore, prays that th may be permitted to be file a fresh petition with Permitted to do s Consequently, th petition is dismissed as the petitioner to file a 2 , Advocate, who is present in ady appearing as Legal Aid n two other matters, may be l Aid Counsel on her behalf in made by the petitioner appears reasonable. Ms. Manvi Verma, present in Court, submits that n to her appointment as Legal e present matter. Accordingly, Advocate, is hereby appointed nsel for the petitioner in the ry, District Legal Services oncerned is directed to process of the aforesaid counsel and missible fee and other charges, able Legal Services Authority le of Fees, are paid to the d Counsel for the work done in , learned Legal Aid Counsel for its that there are several errors rafting of the present revision quire correction and proper necessary particulars. She, at the present revision petition to be withdrawn with liberty to with better particulars. do so. y, the present civil revision d as withdrawn, with liberty to ile a fresh petition with better VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.02 18.40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 09.03.2026 request ma civil revisi particulars. of learned drafting of and peruse application is extremel there is an sufficient r treated as a issues or se passed on t seeking per The Court accordingly the petition RA-CR-38-2026 in CR-2197-2026 particulars, if so advis law. Pending applicat disposed of.” At the outset, it is apposite to 3.2026, this Court had permitted th est made through learned Legal Aid revision petition with liberty to file culars. The said liberty was granted af arned counsel that there were seve ing of the petition, which necessitated Having heard the review-appl perused the record, this Court find cation is wholly misconceived and not It is a settled proposition of la tremely limited in scope and can be ex is an error apparent on the face of t cient reason analogous thereto. A rev ed as an appeal in disguise, nor can it s or seeking a rehearing on merits. In the present case, the ord ed on the specific request made on beh ing permission to withdraw the petition Court merely acceded to the said re rdingly. Once the petitioner has con etition with such liberty, she cannot b 3 dvised and in accordance with lication(s), if any, shall stand(s) ite to notice that vide order dated tted the petitioner, on her own l Aid Counsel, to withdraw the o file a fresh petition with better nted after recording the statement several errors apparent in the itated withdrawal and refiling. applicant, appearing in person, t finds that the present review nd not maintainable. n of law that the power of review be exercised only in cases where e of the record, or for any other A review proceeding cannot be can it be invoked for re-agitating he order dated 09.03.2026 was on behalf of the petitioner herself, petition with liberty to file afresh. said request and granted liberty s consciously opted to withdraw nnot be permitted to turn around VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.02 18.40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document and seek r instance. error appar There is n warranting application withdrawal already be particulars, efficacious present rev said course present rev of. April 02, 2 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo RA-CR-38-2026 in CR-2197-2026 seek review of the very order whic No ground has been made ou apparent on the face of the record in t e is neither any patent illegality no anting interference in exercise of revie cation, in effect, seeks to recall or wal, which is impermissible in law. It is also pertinent to obser dy been granted liberty to file a culars, if so advised, and in accordan acious remedy already stands availabl nt review application appears to be an course. In view of the above, this C nt review application. Accordingly, the same is dism Pending application(s), if any , 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 4 which was passed at her own ade out to show that there is any rd in the order dated 09.03.2026. lity nor any jurisdictional error f review jurisdiction. The present all or undo a voluntary act of n law. observe that the petitioner has ile a fresh petition with better cordance with law. Therefore, an vailable to the petitioner, and the o be an attempt to circumvent the this Court finds no merit in the dismissed. if any, shall also stand disposed ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.02 18.40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document