Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16282 (HP)

SANJAY VERMA v. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

EX.P./968/2026 · 2026-07-21

Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.968 of 2026 Decided on: 21.07.2026 ____________________________________________________________ Sanjay Verma ...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________ Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner: Mr. Naresh K. Shama, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Amandeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3-State. Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Senior Advocate, with Ms. Shivani Priya, Advocate, for respondent No.4. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj , Judge (Oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has produced a communication dated 17.07.2026, issued by the Additional Director (RD), H.P., Shimla-9 and copy of notification dated 02.06.2026, issued by the Secretary (Rural Dev.) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, which are taken on record. 2. A perusal of aforesaid notification dated 02.06.2026, reveals that on the recommendation of 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 Departmental Promotion Committee and in view of the judgment passed in CWP No.9063 of 2025, the petitioner has been ordered to be promoted to the post of Block Development Officer, (Class-I Gazetted) in the Level 17 of the Pay matrix i.e. ₹53,600-1,70,100/- on regular basis, w.e.f. 09.01.2025, along with all consequential benefits. 3. Since the mandate contained in the judgment dated 09.12.2025, passed by this Court in CWP No.9063 of 2025, titled, Sanjay Verma vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors., has been complied with, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present petition and the same is closed. However, it is made clear that in case the arrears, if any, are not released in favour of the petitioner, within eight weeks from today, in terms of the directions given by this Court in aforementioned judgment, he shall be at liberty to file an application for revival of the execution petition. 4. Accordingly, the execution petition is disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. 21 st July , 2026 ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (Anurag) Judge