Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16279 (KAR)

SRI. H N RAMAPPA v. THE KARNATAKA BANK LTD

WP/9959/2021 · 2026-03-05

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13371 WP No. 9959 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 9959 OF 2021 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. H N RAMAPPA S/O LATE MUDDURANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS R/AT HEGGADA HALLI VILLAGE AJJAMPURA HOBLI AJJAMPURA TALUK CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT - 577 550 (SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED) 2. H R HEMANTA RAJU S/O RAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT HEGGADA HALLI VILLAGE AJJAMPURA HOBLI AJJAMPURA TALUK CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT - 577 550 3. H R RANGASWAMY S/O RAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/AT HEGGADA HALLI VILLAGE AJJAMPURA HOBLI AJJAMPURA TALUK CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT - 577 550 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. L. SRINIVASA BABU.,ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13371 WP No. 9959 of 2021 AND: 1. THE KARNATAKA BANK LTD HOSADURGA BRANCH CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 549 REP BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER 2. THE RECOVERY OFFICER -I DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL - I BENGALURU …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K.V.SHYAMA PRASADA, ADVOCATE FOR R1) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 20.04.2019 IN O.A.NO.1225/2017 AND PROCLAMATION NOTICE NO.409/2019 O.A.NO.1225/2017 DATED 29.03.2021 PASSED BY THE R-2 A COPY OF WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-E AND F RESPECTIVELY; DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONERS FOR REQUESTING TO CLEAR LOAN INSTALLMENTS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME THE SAME IS PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-H. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13371 WP No. 9959 of 2021 CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER No representation on behalf of the petitioners. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent - Bank submits that the entire loan amount is cleared and the loan account is closed. The submission by the learned counsel on record for the respondent - Bank is accepted. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. All pending IAs. in this petition shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE RB