Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16275 (CHH)

NILESH KUMAR KHANDEY v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/1182/2026 · 2026-01-29

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:5310 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1182 of 2026 1 - Nilesh Kumar Khandey S/o Kundan Lal Khandey Aged About 42 Years Working As Hostel Superintendent Grade C, And Posted At Post Metric Obc Boys Hostel, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Tribal And Schedule Caste Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Commissioner Department Of Tribal And Schedule Caste Development, Indravati Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Collector Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (C.G.) 4 - Assistant Commissioner Tribal Development Office At Collector (Tribal Development Branch), Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Pradeep Kumar Jogi, Advocate For Respondents-State : Mr. Rishab Bisen, Panel Lawyer SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 30/01 /2026 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the impugned relieving order dated 14.01.2026 passed by the Respondent No. 3 arising 2 out of transfer order dated 13.01.2026 passed by the Respondent No. 2, in the interest of justice. 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to consider pending representation of the petitioner for seeking preference choice place of posting of counseling, within stipulated time, in the interest of justice. 10.3 Any other relief which may be suitable in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be granted.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner while working on the post of Hostel Superintendent Grade – D was promoted as Hostel Superintendent Grade – C pursuant to the promotion order dated 10.06.2025 and petitioner was posted at Post Metric OBC Boys Hostel, District – Mahasamund and since then, he is posted and working there. He contended that subsequently, the State Government has decided to place the promoted Hostel Superintendent Grade – C by counseling. Petitioner was not called for counseling initially at District Level and Divisional Level Committee, however, petitioner was called for counseling at the State Level Committee. According to the order dated 13.01.2026, petitioner was posted at Tribal Post Metric OBC Boys Hostel, Sonhat, District – Korea, Chhattisgarh. As the petitioner was not given an opportunity to participate in the counseling proceedings at District Level and Divisional Level, petitioner is made to suffer. He further submits that petitioner has submitted representation dated 14.06.2025 before the Respondent No. 2 (Annexure P/5), however, till date representation is not considered and therefore, direction be issued to the Respondent No. 2 to take decision on the pending representation at the earliest. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the Respondents/State submits that as the petitioner is not pressing this writ petition on merits, but is only seeking a direction to the Respondents No. 2 to consider and decide the representation dated 14.06.2025 (Annexure P/5) submitted by the 3 petitioner, he is having no objection. If the representation is still pending consideration, it will be considered and appropriate orders would be passed in accordance with law. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents enclosed along with the writ petition. 5. On due consideration of the submission of counsel for the respective parties, facts and circumstances of the case, nature of grievance raised by the petitioner, this writ petition at this stage is disposed of directing the Respondents No. 2 to consider and take decision on the representation dated 14.06.2025 (Annexure P/5) submitted by the petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a further period of 03 weeks from the date of receipt of the order. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY Date: 2026.02.05 11:39:39 +0530