VENKATESHWARA CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THOR. GOVT. PLEADER
WP/7010/2025 · 2026-10-07
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16274 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16274 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
13-WP-7010-2025 (C).odt Pallavi IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7010 OF 2025 Venkateshwara Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. ...Petitioner Versus The State Of Maharashtra Thor. Govt. Pleader ...Respondent ... Mr. Nilesh R. Pandey a/w Mr. Sameer S. Vispute and Siddharth Jaiswal for the Petitioner. Mrs. Neha S. Bhide, GP a/w Mrs. M.S. Bane, AGP for the Respondent No.1 - State. Mr. Sandeep Dilip Shinde for Respondent Nos.2 to 8. Mr. A.V. Sakhare, Sr. Advocate i/b. Vivek Salunke for Respondent No.9. ...
CORAM : MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, CJ. & ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.
DATE : 7th OCTOBER, 2026. P.C.:
1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. The learned counsel for Respondent No.2 – Kalyan Dombivli Municipal Corporation (KDMC) states that the complaint of the Petitioner shall be considered, shortly. 1 of 1 PALLAVI MAHENDRA WARGAONKAR Digitally signed by PALLAVI MAHENDRA WARGAONKAR Date: 2026.10.08 13:07:44 +0530
13-WP-7010-2025 (C).odt
2. Considering the above and the relief as prayed for, we are not inclined to keep the matter pending for consideration.
3. With the consent of the parties, the instant Writ Petition is Disposed Of with an observation that the Complaint of the Petitioner be decided by the Respondent No.6 - Assistant Director, Town Planning, KDMC on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of uploading of this order. Such decision shall be taken after giving a sufficient opportunity of hearing to all the stakeholders. The parties shall appear before Respondent No.6 on 12th October 2026 at 12.00 pm.
4. It is also expected that on the date fixed all the parties shall extend full co-operation in resolving the matter on merits of the matter.
5. We clarify that we have not adverted into the merits of the matter.
[ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.] [CHIEF JUSTICE] 2 of 2