Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16273 (AP)

CHEBOLU APPA RAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/3337/2026 · 2026-02-05

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010053482026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 3337/2026 Between: 1. CHEBOLU APPA RAO, S/O PULLAIAH, AGE 60 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O MOGALLU VILLAGE, PALAKODERU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI - 522503. 2. THE DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER CUM SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT BHIMAVARAM - 534201. 3. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICERCUMDEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BHIMAVARAM SUB- DIVISION, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT - 534201. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, , PALAKODERU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT - 534210. 5. CHEBOLU TRINADHUDU, S/O LATE PULLAIAH, AGE 69 YEARS, OCC EMPLOYEE, R/O NATIVE OF MOGALLU VILLAGE, PALAKODERU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT R/O D.NO.9- 121, SRIVARI VENUE, NEAR VAARTHA RENIGUNTA ROAD, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT - 517501. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.3337 of 2026 Dated 06.02.2026 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K V L NARASIMHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 3 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.3337 of 2026 Dated 06.02.2026 ORDER: The Writ Petition has been filed for the following relief: “…to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the official of respondents in interfering into the civil dispute, calling the Petitioner to the police station, pressurizing for private settlement with unofficial respondent, as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the official respondents not to interfere into civil dispute and call the Petitioner for private settlement with unofficial respondent …” 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader. 3. Sri K.V.L.Narasimha Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that Respondent No.4, at the behest of Respondent No.5, called him to the police station and interfered in the civil dispute pending between the petitioner and Respondent No.5. 4. Sri Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, submits that the police never interfered in the civil dispute and never unnecessarily called the petitioner to the police station. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and recording the submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing Respondent Nos.2 to 4 not to interfere further in any manner in the civil dispute pending between the petitioner and Respondent No.5. 4 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.3337 of 2026 Dated 06.02.2026 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 06.02.2026 PRA 5 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.3337 of 2026 Dated 06.02.2026 44 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 3337 of 2026 Date: 06.02.2026 PRA