1 / 2 2026:CGHC:5454 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 10793 of 2025 Akhilesh Kumar S/o Shri Banwari Lal Aged About 50 Years R/o Villa 35, Maruti Life Styale, Mohaba Bazar, Tatibandh, District Raipur, C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Women And Child Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nava Raipur, District Raipur, C.G. 2 - The Director Women And Child Development Department, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nava Raipur, District Raipur, C.G. 3 - The Chairman Chhattisgarh Rajya Mahila Ayog, Raipur, C.G. 4 - The Secretary Chhattisgarh Rajya Mahila Ayog, Raipur, C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Siddharth Pandey, Advocate For Resp. No.1 & 2/State : Ms. Akanksha Verma Dabhadker, Panel Lawyer For Resp. No.3 & 4 : Mr. Ashutosh Singh Kachhawaha, Advocate S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 31/01/2026 1. Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that amount of Rs.1,39,500/- has been disbursed in favour of petitioner and therefore now the relief as sought for by the petitioner has been granted. Digitally signed by PRAVEEN KUMAR SINHA Date: 2026.02.03 10:28:06 +0530 2 / 2 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that subsequent to filing of covering memo, petitioner has also submitted document which is an application/representation submitted by petitioner before the Secretary, Chhattisgarh Rajya Mahila Aayog on 17.10.2025 requesting for payment of balance amount of Rs.99,000/- of 66 hearings, which till date, is pending consideration. 3. Learned counsel for respondents jointly submit that earlier also, amount due and payable to petitioner could not be disbursed in his favour in time for want of fund as the respondents are dependent upon the fund to be released by the State Govt. for running institution. 4. In view of submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, representation submitted by petitioner as also submission made by learned counsel for respondents that for want of fund, amount could not be disbursed in favour of petitioner, respondents are directed to consider claim of petitioner and to release fund if found that petitioner is entitled for, after verification, within a period of 2 months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 5. With the aforesaid observation and direction writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Praveen