CRM-M-19611- IN THE H (118) SUKHDEV SING STATE OF PUNJ CORAM: HON Present: Ms. S Mr. V Mr. R MANISHA BATR 1. The by the Court of L No.72 dated 22.03 and Section 25 of Amritsar, whereby forfeited to the Sta 2. It is a regularly appearin appear on 04.12.2 vehicle had suffe before the Court i intentional but du -2026 (O&M) 1 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH SINGH @ ROHIT Versus PUNJAB HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANIS s. Saroj Kumari, Advocate for Mr. Vinod K. Kaushal, Advocate for Mr. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior DAG **** BATRA, J. (ORAL) The petitioner is seeking quashing of rt of Learned Special Judge, Amritsa 22.03.2014 registered under Sections 25 of Arms Act at Police Station Chh hereby the bail of the petitioner was the State. It is argued by learned counsel for t pearing before the Learned Trial Co 04.12.2025 as he was out of station suffered some technical snag due t ourt in time nor he could inform his but due to the reason explained abo JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CRM-M-19611-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 16.04.2026 ... Petitioner ...Respondent ANISHA BATRA for the petitioner r DAG, Punjab ing of order dated 04.12.2025 passed mritsar in case arising out of FIR ctions 399, 402, 379 and 411 of IPC n Chheharta, District Amritsar City, r was cancelled and the bonds were l for the petitioner that he had been rial Court. However, he could not tation and while coming back, his due to which he could not appear m his counsel. His absence was not d above. Learned counsel for the M) 2026 ssed FIR IPC City, were been not , his pear s not r the AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.16 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-19611- petitioner has furt Learned Trial Cou upon him. It is, th 3. Notic 4. Learn the Court and su therefore, it does n 5. This parties. 6. The p non-appearance, infirmity in the im petitioner is ready ready to abide by Court, the petitio surrender before t fixed and on doin the satisfaction of Court. 7. A cop 16.04.2026 Amit Sharma -2026 (O&M) 2 further submitted that he is ready t ial Court and to abide by the terms a t is, therefore, argued that the petition Notice of motion. Learned State counsel accepts notice nd submitted that there is no lacuna does not deserve to be set aside. This Court has heard the submission The petitioner had absented himself his bail was cancelled. Though t the impugned order, however, keep ready to join the proceedings before de by the terms and conditions to be i petition is disposed of by giving d efore the Trial Court on or before 27 n doing so and furnishing fresh perso of Learned Trial Court, he shall b A copy of this order be sent to the Le (MA Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable:- Yes/No ready to join proceedings before the erms and conditions to be imposed tition deserves to be allowed. notice of the petition on the asking of lacuna in the impugned order and issions made by the counsel for the mself on 04.12.2025 and due to his ough this Court finds no illegality or , keeping in view the fact that the efore the Learned Trial Court and is to be imposed upon him by the Trial ving direction to the petitioner to ore 27.04.2026 i.e. the date already personal as well as surety bonds to shall be admitted to bail by the Trial the Learned Trial Court. (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE oned:- Yes/No es/No e the osed ng of and r the o his ty or t the is Trial er to eady ds to Trial AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.16 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.