( 2026:JHHC:16945 ) -1- A.B.A. No. 3026 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3026 of 2026 Pawan Yadav @ Pawan Kumar, aged about 26 years, son of Babulal Yadav, resident of Village- Chakarwar, P.O. & P.S. Itkhori, District- Chatra … Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ----- For the Petitioner : Mrs. Jasvindar Mazumdar, Advocate For the State : Ms. Kumari Rashmi, A.P.P. ----- 02/12.06.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Itkhori P.S. Case No.46 of 2026, registered for the offence under Sections 64, 351(2), 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the Court of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chatra. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that false allegation is made against the petitioner. She further submits that the petitioner is known to the complainant. She then submits that unnecessarily complaint case was instituted and by the order of the learned Court, it was converted into FIR. She draws attention of the Court to the contents of the complaint case and submits that the allegations are there of establishing relationship on 27.03.2024, whereas, the complaint case has been filed in the month of December, 2025. She next submits that in the order of the learned Sessions Judge, it has come that the complainant/informant has refused to go for medical check-up. She also submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case and in view of that, anticipatory bail may kindly be granted to the petitioner. ( 2026:JHHC:16945 ) -2- A.B.A. No. 3026 of 2026 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of forcefully establishing relationship and in view of that, the prayer for anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. 5. On perusal of the contents of the complaint case, it transpires that the allegation of establishing relationship is dated 27.03.2024 and it has been further stated that at several times, they have met and in spite of that, the FIR was not lodged and finally a complaint case was filed in the month of December, 2025. In the order of the learned Sessions Judge, it has come that the complainant/informant has refused to go for medical check-up, which prima facies doubts the story of the complainant/informant. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the above-named petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender, he shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chatra in connection with Itkhori P.S. Case No.46 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 12th June, 2026 Ajay/