1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Ex. Petition No. 83 of 2026 Decided on: 20.07.2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Puran Chand …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General for respondents No. 1 to 4. Mr. Tara Chand Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.5. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Though the respondents have filed compliance affidavit, however, learned Additional Advocate General has place on record office instructions dated 13.03.2026 from Block Medical Officer, Jawalamukhi, Kangra, H.P. conveying therein that petitioner’s pension case had already been settled by the office of Accountant General of H.P. vide pension documents dated 06.11.2024. The office instructions also have enclosures of some relevant documents including certificate & report of Accountant General (A & E) on admissibility of pension and DCRG. Learned counsel for the petitioner has grievance to the aforesaid instructions as also, the stand taken by the 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 respondents in the compliance affidavit which according to him is unlawful denial of due admissible pension to the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner be reserved liberty to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law for the redressal of his surviving grievances if any. 3. Granting such liberty, the present execution petition stands disposed of. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua July 20, 2026 Judge yogesh