Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) 43/2026
KUNAL SHUKLA
.....Appellant
Through: Mr. Vikas Singh & Mr. Sudhir
Nandrajog , Sr. Advs. with Mr.
Mayank Jain, Mr. Madhur
Jain, Mr. Arpit Goel, Mr.
Deepak Jain, Ms. Ankita Singh,
Ms. Deepika Kalia, Mr.
Deepanshu S., Mr. Sudeep
Chandra & Ms. Khushi, Advs.
versus
HIMAYANI PURI AND ORS
.....Respondents
Through: Mr. Mahesh Jethamalani,
Mr. Mohit Mathur, Mr.
Pramod Kr. Dubey & Mr Sunil
Dalal, Sr. Advs. with Mr. Ravi
Sharma, Mr. Akhil
Sachak, Mr. Shantanu Agarwal,
Ms. Madhulika Rai Sharma,
Mr. Kapil Rustagi, Mr. Manas
Arora, Mr. Syed Hamza
Ghayoor, Mr. Abhinav Tyagi,
Ms. Rasveen Kaur Kapoor, Mr.
Vineeth Varma Penmetsa, Mr.
Anjani Kumar Rai, Ms. Prachi
Dubey, Ms. Raadhika Chawla,
Ms. Sunanda Tulisan, Ms.
Mehak Joshi, Mr. Praful
Kumar, Mr. Vignesh
Ramanathan, Ms. Dipika
Prasad, Mr. Rupraj Banerjee
& Mr. Vaibhav Thaledi,
Advs./R1 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/04/2026 at 12:11:27
Mr. Abhishek K. Singh, Mr.
Saurabh Kr. & Ms. Vedanshi
Jalan, Advs./R18.(VC)
Mr. Dhananjai Rana,
CGSC/R19&20
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARY
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGAR
O R D E R %
06.04.2026 CM APPLs. 21561-62/2026 (Exemption)
1. Allowed subject to all just exceptions.
2. Accordingly, the applications stand disposed of.
FAO(OS) 43/2026 & CM APPL. 21560/2026 (Stay)
3. The present appeal has been filed under Section 10 of the Delhi High Court Act, 1966 read with Order XLIII Rule 1(r) and Section 104 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as ‘CPC’) against the Order dated 17.03.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge in I.A. no. 6659 of 2026 in CS(OS) no. 210 of 2026, whereby, the learned Single Judge has granted interim injunction against the appellant in the application moved by the respondent under
Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of the CPC.
4. After arguing at some length, learned senior counsel for the appellant prays for and is granted one week’s time to file an application for vacation of stay with copy to the other side before the learned Single Judge. The respondent may file reply thereto within one week thereafter.
5. Let the matter be placed before the learned Single Judge on This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/04/2026 at 12:11:27
23.04.2026, who shall endeavour to decide the injunction application and the application for vacation of stay, if any, after hearing the parties and taking into consideration the pleadings filed by both the sides without being influenced by any of the observations made in the impugned order.
6. In view of the above, the present appeal, along with pending applications, if any, stands disposed of in the above terms.
VIVEK CHAUDHARY, J
RENU BHATNAGAR, J APRIL 6, 2026/pr/sm
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/04/2026 at 12:11:27