IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 11892 of 2026 Decided on: 21 .07.2026 Piyush Raj …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Rocky, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. As prayed for, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the representation made by the petitioner, appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-3, shall be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the averments made therein within a period of 12 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 21, 2026 (narender) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 11889 of 2026 Decided on: 21 .07.2026 Kiran Kumar …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?2 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Rocky, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. As prayed for, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the representation made by the petitioner, appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-3, shall be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the averments made therein within a period of 12 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 21, 2026 (narender) 2 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 11886 of 2026 Decided on: 21 .07.2026 Sunil Kumar …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?3 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Rocky, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. As prayed for, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the representation made by the petitioner, appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-3, shall be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the averments made therein within a period of 12 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 21, 2026 (narender) 3 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 11885 of 2026 Decided on: 21 .07.2026 Anu Radha …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?4 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Rocky, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. As prayed for, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the representation made by the petitioner, appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-3, shall be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the averments made therein within a period of 12 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 21, 2026 (narender) 4 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 11883 of 2026 Decided on: 21 .07.2026 Shalini Chaudhary …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?5 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Rocky, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. As prayed for, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the representation made by the petitioner, appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-3, shall be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the averments made therein within a period of 12 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 21, 2026 (narender) 5 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 11884 of 2026 Decided on: 21 .07.2026 Madhu Kumari …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?6 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Rocky, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. As prayed for, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the representation made by the petitioner, appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-3, shall be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the averments made therein within a period of 12 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 21, 2026 (narender) 6 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 11875 of 2026 Decided on: 21 .07.2026 Nandani Sarawati and others …….Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?7 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioners : Mr. Rocky, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. As prayed for, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the representation made by the petitioners, appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-3 (colly.), shall be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the averments made therein within a period of 12 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 21, 2026 (narender) 7 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 11887 of 2026 Decided on: 21 .07.2026 Kishan Chand and others …….Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?8 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioners : Mr. Rocky, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. As prayed for, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the representation made by the petitioners, appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-3 (colly.), shall be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the averments made therein within a period of 12 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 21, 2026 (narender) 8 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 11858 of 2026 Decided on: 21 .07.2026 Pooja Kudiyal …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?9 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Rocky, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. As prayed for, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the representation made by the petitioner, appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-3, shall be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the averments made therein within a period of 12 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 21, 2026 (narender) 9 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 11826 of 2026 Decided on: 21 .07.2026 Sunil Sharma …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?10 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Rocky, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. As prayed for, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the representation made by the petitioner, appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-3, shall be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the averments made therein within a period of 12 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 21, 2026 (narender) 10 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 11880 of 2026 Decided on: 21 .07.2026 Reena Kumari …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?11 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Ms. Gurmeet Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. As prayed for, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the representation made by the petitioner, appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-4, shall be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the averments made therein within a period of 12 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 21, 2026 (narender) 11 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 11837 of 2026 Decided on: 21 .07.2026 Dr. Mann Chand Rana …….Petitioner Versus Chaudhary Sarawan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidalaya, Palampur and another … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?12 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Radhey Shyam Gautam, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Prince Chauhan, Advocate for respondent No. 1. : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General for respondent No. 2. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Prince Chauhan, learned Counsel and Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respective respondents. 2. As prayed for, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the representation made by the petitioner, appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-3, shall be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the averments made therein within a period of 12 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 21, 2026 (narender) 12 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 11961 of 2026 Decided on: 21 .07.2026 Indu Bala …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?13 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Ms. Gurmeet Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. As prayed for, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the representation made by the petitioner, appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-4, shall be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the averments made therein within a period of 12 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 21, 2026 (narender) 13 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 11958 of 2026 Decided on: 21 .07.2026 Ruchi …….Petitioner Versus The State of Himachal Pradesh and another … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?14 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Ms. Gurmeet Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. As prayed for, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the representation made by the petitioner, appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-3, shall be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the averments made therein within a period of 12 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 21, 2026 (narender) 14 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 11898 of 2026 Decided on: 21 .07.2026 Hemlata …….Petitioner Versus The State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?15 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Ms. Gurmeet Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. As prayed for, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the representation made by the petitioner, appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-4, shall be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the averments made therein within a period of 12 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 21, 2026 (narender) 15 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 11880 of 2026 Decided on: 21 .07.2026 Reena Kumari …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?16 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Ms. Gurmeet Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. As prayed for, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the representation made by the petitioner, appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-4, shall be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the averments made therein within a period of 12 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 21, 2026 (narender) 16 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 11882 of 2026 Decided on: 21 .07.2026 Madan Lal …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?17 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Munish Datwalia, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. As prayed for, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the representation made by the petitioner, appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-3, shall be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the averments made therein within a period of 12 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 21, 2026 (narender) 17 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 11881 of 2026 Decided on: 21 .07.2026 Surya Pal …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?18 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Munish Datwalia, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. As prayed for, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the representation made by the petitioner, appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-3, shall be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the averments made therein within a period of 12 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 21, 2026 (narender) 18 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 11879 of 2026 Decided on: 21 .07.2026 Milap Singh …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?19 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Munish Datwalia, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. As prayed for, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the representation made by the petitioner, appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-3, shall be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the averments made therein within a period of 12 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 21, 2026 (narender) 19 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 11877 of 2026 Decided on: 21 .07.2026 Kamal …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?20 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Munish Datwalia, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. As prayed for, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the representation made by the petitioner, appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-3, shall be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the averments made therein within a period of 12 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 21, 2026 (narender) 20 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 11876 of 2026 Decided on: 21 .07.2026 Sudheer Kumar …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?21 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Munish Datwalia, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. As prayed for, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the representation made by the petitioner, appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-3, shall be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the averments made therein within a period of 12 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 21, 2026 (narender) 21 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?